Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34888245›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

High-LET Carbon and Iron Ions Elicit a Prolonged and Amplified p53 Signaling and Inflammatory Response Compared to low-LET X-Rays in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.

Ellina Macaeva, Kevin Tabury, Arlette Michaux, Ann Janssen, Nicole Averbeck, Marjan Moreels, Winnok H De Vos, Sarah Baatout, Roel Quintens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Relative biological effectiveness and neural stem cell fate in carbon ion-irradiated human brain organoids.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. High-LET charged particles: radiobiology and application for new approaches in radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ellina MacaevaRadiobiology Unit, Studiecentrum voor kernenergie - Centre d'étude de l'énergie nucléaire (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Kevin TaburyRadiobiology Unit, Studiecentrum voor kernenergie - Centre d'étude de l'énergie nucléaire (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Arlette MichauxRadiobiology Unit, Studiecentrum voor kernenergie - Centre d'étude de l'énergie nucléaire (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Ann JanssenRadiobiology Unit, Studiecentrum voor kernenergie - Centre d'étude de l'énergie nucléaire (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Nicole AverbeckDepartment of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany.
Marjan MoreelsRadiobiology Unit, Studiecentrum voor kernenergie - Centre d'étude de l'énergie nucléaire (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Winnok H De VosDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sarah BaatoutRadiobiology Unit, Studiecentrum voor kernenergie - Centre d'étude de l'énergie nucléaire (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Roel QuintensRadiobiology Unit, Studiecentrum voor kernenergie - Centre d'étude de l'énergie nucléaire (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre · BEGSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research · DEKU Leuven · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the differences in biological response to photon and particle radiation is important for optimal exploitation of particle therapy for cancer patients, as well as for the adequate application of radiation protection measures for astronauts. To address this need, we compared the transcriptional profiles of isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells 8 h after exposure to 1 Gy of X-rays, carbon ions or iron ions with those of non-irradiated cells using microarray technology. All genes that were found differentially expressed in response to either radiation type were up-regulated and predominantly controlled by p53. Quantitative PCR of selected genes revealed a significantly higher up-regulation 24 h after exposure to heavy ions as compared to X-rays, indicating their prolonged activation. This coincided with increased residual DNA damage as evidenced by quantitative γH2AX foci analysis. Furthermore, despite the converging p53 signature between radiation types, specific gene sets related to the immune response were significantly enriched in up-regulated genes following irradiation with heavy ions. In addition, irradiation, and in particular exposure to carbon ions, promoted transcript variation. Differences in basal and iron ion exposure-induced expression of DNA repair genes allowed the identification of a donor with distinct DNA repair profile. This suggests that gene signatures may serve as a sensitive indicator of individual DNA damage repair capacity. In conclusion, we have shown that photon and particle irradiation induce similar transcriptional pathways, albeit with variable amplitude and timing, but also elicit radiation type-specific responses that may have implications for cancer progression and treatment.

Indexed as

alternative splicingDNA damagegene expressionheavy ionsimmunityionizing radiationp53X-rays

Identifiers

PMID34888245
PMCPMC8649625
OpenAlexW3216732157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.