ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Integrating Clinical Data and Attentional CT Imaging Features for Esophageal Fistula Prediction in Esophageal Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI in esophageal cancer: advances, barriers to clinical translation, and perspectives for digital health.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- The application of artificial intelligence in upper gastrointestinal cancers.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Review
- Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer by a clinical-deep learning radiomics model : Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy patients.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Clinical-radiomics nomogram for the risk prediction of esophageal fistula in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Multi-omics and Multi-VOIs to predict esophageal fistula in esophageal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- The Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Digestive System Neoplasms: A Review.Health data science · 2023Review
- Chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasonography in staging diagnosis of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThis study aims to develop a risk model to predict esophageal fistula in esophageal cancer (EC) patients by learning from both clinical data and computerized tomography (CT) radiomic features. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, computerized tomography (CT) images and clinical data of 186 esophageal fistula patients and 372 controls (1:2 matched by the diagnosis time of EC, sex, marriage, and race) were collected. All patients had esophageal cancer and did not receive esophageal surgery. 70% patients were assigned into training set randomly and 30% into validation set. We firstly use a novel attentional convolutional neural network for radiographic descriptor extraction from nine views of planes of contextual CT, segmented tumor and neighboring structures. Then clinical factors including general, diagnostic, pathologic, therapeutic and hematological parameters are fed into neural network for high-level latent representation. The radiographic descriptors and latent clinical factor representations are finally associated by a fully connected layer for patient level risk prediction using SoftMax classifier.
results512 deep radiographic features and 32 clinical features were extracted. The integrative deep learning model achieved C-index of 0.901, sensitivity of 0.835, and specificity of 0.918 on validation set with superior performance than non-integrative model using CT imaging alone (C-index = 0.857) or clinical data alone (C-index = 0.780).
conclusionThe integration of radiomic descriptors from CT and clinical data significantly improved the esophageal fistula prediction. We suggest that this model has the potential to support individualized stratification and treatment planning for EC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.