ReviewWorld journal of psychiatry2021
Phantom bite syndrome: Revelation from clinically focused review.
Review in World journal of psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Symptom Persistence Across Selected Orofacial Conditions: Toward a Chronic Explanatory Profile.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Review
- Mechanisms Underlying Burning Mouth Syndrome and Occlusal Dysesthesia: Shared and Distinct Pathways of Oral Sensory Dysregulation.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Review
- Occlusal Dysesthesia: Identifying Knowledge Gaps to Advance Clinical Care.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Occlusal Sensitivity to Articulating Foils in Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders and Healthy Controls.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Occlusal Dysesthesia (Phantom Bite Syndrome): A Scoping Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Sheldon Friel Memorial Lecture 2025-Orthodontics and Temporomandibular Disorders: evolving views on risk factors, diagnosis, and management.European journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Working-age patients with medically unexplained oral symptoms who receive public assistance in Japan.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Aberrant occlusal sensitivity in adults with increased somatosensory amplification: a case-control study.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Dental conditions in patients with medically unexplained oral symptoms.Journal of dental sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phantom bite syndrome (PBS), also called occlusal dysesthesia, is characterized by persistent non-verifiable occlusal discrepancies. Such erroneous and unshakable belief of a "wrong bite" might impel patients to visit multiple dental clinics to meet their requirements to their satisfaction. Subsequently, it takes a toll on their quality of life causing, career disruption, financial loss and suicidal thoughts. In general, patients with PBS are quite rare but distinguishable if ever encountered. Since Marbach reported the first two cases in 1976, there have been dozens of published cases regarding this phenomenon, but only a few original studies were conducted. Despite the lack of official classification and guidelines, many authors agreed on the existence of a PBS "consistent pattern" that clinicians should be made aware. Nevertheless, the treatment approach has been solely based on incomplete knowledge of etiology, in which none of the proposed theories are fully explained in all the available cases. In this review, we have discussed the critical role of enhancing dental professionals' awareness of this phenomenon and suggested a comprehensive approach for PBS, provided by a multidisciplinary team of dentists, psychiatrists and exclusive psychotherapists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.