ReviewJournal of clinical and translational science2021
An integrative review and practical guide to team development interventions for translational science teams: One size does not fit all.
Review in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Axiology and dynamics of contemporary research groups: a systematic review and hermeneutic meta-analysis of knowledge, values, and social elements.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators of conducting research with team science approach: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2023Pooled it
- Knowledge mapping and bibliometric insights of scientific research on targeted protein degradation in oncology.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Bridging sponsor-site operations through reciprocal on-site training of CRAs and CRCs: Impact on workflow knowledge and behavior among trial staff.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Strategy Jams: using design thinking to charter teams with compelling purpose and sound structure.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Pilot wrap-around support initiative: Enhanced support for internally funded CTSA pilot awards.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- The Super Spreadsheet: collaborative information infrastructure in translational teams.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- SPARKing academic technologies across the valley of death.Nature biotechnology · 2024Article
- A randomized controlled trial of a team science intervention to enhance collaboration readiness and behavior among early career scholars in the Clinical and Translational Science Award network.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Optimizing external advisory committee meetings of Clinical and Translational Science Awards through focused pre-review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Article
- Examining how study teams manage different viewpoints and priorities in patient-centered outcomes research: Results of an embedded multiple case study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Toward a translational team science hierarchy of needs: Exploring the information management challenges of team science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Freelance information management agents: why information management is so hard on translational teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Optimizing team science in an academic medical center: A qualitative examination of investigator perspectives.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Win-win interactions: Results and implications of a user needs assessment of clinical and translational scientists.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Exploring team dynamics during the development of a multi-institutional cross-disciplinary translational team: Implications for potential best practices.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Introduction to the themed issue on the design, development, evaluation, and dissemination of team science interventions in clinical and translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the need to tackle complex clinical and societal problems rises, researchers are increasingly taking on a translational approach. This approach, which seeks to integrate theories, methodologies, and frameworks from various disciplines across a team of researchers, places emphasis on translation of findings in order to offer practical solutions to real-world problems. While translational research leads to a number of positive outcomes, there are also a multitude of barriers to conducting effective team science, such as effective coordination and communication across the organizational, disciplinary, and even geographic boundaries of science teams. Given these barriers to success, there is a significant need to establish team interventions that increase science team effectiveness as translational research becomes the new face of science. This review is intended to provide translational scientists with an understanding of barriers to effective team science and equip them with the necessary tools to overcome such barriers. We provide an overview of translational science teams, discuss barriers to science team effectiveness, demonstrate the lacking state of current interventions, and present recommendations for improving interventions in science teams by applying best practices from the teams and groups literature across the four phases of transdisciplinary research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.