ArticleJournal of the California Dental Association2021
Advances in Tissue Engineering and Implications for Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction.
Article in Journal of the California Dental Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Trends and Innovations in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
- Advanced progress of adipose-derived stem cells-related biomaterials in maxillofacial regeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Categories, applications, and potential of stem cells in bone regeneration: an overview.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Antioxidant Materials in Oral and Maxillofacial Tissue Regeneration: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Systematic review on utility of stem-cell engineering on outcome of oral and maxillofacial prosthesis (rehabilitation).National journal of maxillofacial surgeryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReconstructive surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region poses many challenges due to the complexity of the facial skeleton and the presence of composite defects involving soft tissue, bone and nerve defects.
methodsCurrent methods of reconstruction include autologous grafting techniques with local or regional rotational flaps or microvascular free flaps, allografts, xenografts and prosthetic devices.
resultsTissue engineering therapies utilizing stem cells provide promise for enhancing the current reconstructive options.
conclusionsThis article is a review on tissue engineering strategies applicable to specialists who treat oral and maxillofacial defects. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: We review advancements in hard tissue regeneration for dental rehabilitation, soft tissue engineering, nerve regeneration and innovative strategies for reconstruction of major defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34887651PMC8653764What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.