ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2021
Anatomy Recognition in CT Images of Head & Neck Region via Precision Atlases.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-atlas segmentation methods will benefit from atlases covering the complete spectrum of population patterns, while the difficulties in generating such large enough datasets and the computation burden required in the segmentation procedure reduce its practicality in clinical application. In this work, we start from a viewpoint that different parts of the target object can be recognized by different atlases and propose a precision atlas selection strategy. By comparing regional similarity between target image and atlases, precision atlases are ranked and selected by the frequency of regional best match, which have no need to be globally similar to the target subject at either image-level or object-level, largely increasing the implicit patterns contained in the atlas set. In the proposed anatomy recognition method, atlas building is first achieved by all-to-template registration, where the minimum spanning tree (MST) strategy is used to select a registration template from a subset of radiologically near-normal images. Then, a two-stage recognition process is conducted: in rough recognition, sub-image level similarity is calculated between the test image and each image of the whole atlas set, and only the atlas with the highest similarity contributes to the recognition map regionally; in refined recognition, the atlases with the highest frequencies of best match are selected as the precision atlases and are utilized to further increase the accuracy of boundary matching. The proposed method is demonstrated on 298 computed tomography (CT) images and 9 organs in the Head & Neck (H&N) body region. Experimental results illustrate that our method is effective for organs with different segmentation challenge and samples with different image quality, where remarkable improvement in boundary interpretation is made by refined recognition and most objects achieve a localization error within 2 voxels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.