Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34887510›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Alpha-diversity and microbial community structure of the male urinary microbiota depend on urine sampling method.

Jan Hrbacek, Daniel Morais, Pavel Cermak, Vitezslav Hanacek, Roman Zachoval

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Comparison of the urinary microbiome in men who have sex with men with and without Chlamydia trachomatis infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Human Male Genital Tract Microbiota.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Clinical relevance of expanded quantitative urine culture in health and disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Localization and potential role of prostate microbiota.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jan HrbacekDepartment of Urology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 14059, Prague, Czech Republic. honzahrbacek@gmail.com.
Daniel MoraisLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Videnska 1083, 14200, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel CermakDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 14059, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vitezslav HanacekDepartment of Urology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 14059, Prague, Czech Republic.
Roman ZachovalDepartment of Urology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 14059, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZThomayer University Hospital · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable variation exists in the methodology of urinary microbiota studies published so far including the cornerstone of any biomedical analysis: sample collection. The aim of this study was to compare the urinary microbiota of first-catch voided urine (FCU), mid-stream voided urine (MSU) and aseptically catheterised urine in men and define the most suitable urine sampling method. Forty-nine men (mean age 71.3 years) undergoing endoscopic urological procedures were enrolled in the study. Each of them contributed three samples: first-catch urine (FCU), mid-stream urine (MSU) and a catheterised urine sample. The samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS, n = 35) and expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC, n = 31). Using NGS, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla in our population. The most abundant genera (in order of relative abundance) included: Prevotella, Veillonella, Streptococcus, Porphyromonas, Campylobacter, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Ezakiella, Escherichia and Dialister. Eighty-two of 105 samples were dominated by a single genus. FCU, MSU and catheterised urine samples differed significantly in three of five alpha-diversity measures (ANOVA, p < 0.05): estimated number of operational taxonomic units, Chao1 and abundance-based coverage estimators. Beta-diversity comparisons using the PIME method (Prevalence Interval for Microbiome Evaluation) resulted in clustering of urine samples according to the mode of sampling. EQUC detected cultivable bacteria in 30/31 (97%) FCU and 27/31 (87%) MSU samples. Only 4/31 (13%) of catheterised urine samples showed bacterial growth. Urine samples obtained by transurethral catheterisation under aseptic conditions seem to differ from spontaneously voided urine samples. Whether the added value of a more exact reflection of the bladder microbiota free from urethral contamination outweighs the invasiveness of urethral catheterisation remains to be determined.

Indexed as

BiodiversityMicrobiotaAgedComorbidityHumansMaleMetagenomicsMiddle AgedUrinalysisUrinary Tract

Identifiers

PMID34887510
PMCPMC8660768
OpenAlexW4200323496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.