ArticleScientific reports2021
Predicting deleterious missense genetic variants via integrative supervised nonnegative matrix tri-factorization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among an assortment of genetic variations, Missense are major ones which a small subset of them may led to the upset of the protein function and ultimately end in human diseases. Various machine learning methods were declared to differentiate deleterious and benign missense variants by means of a large number of features, including structure, sequence, interaction networks, gene disease associations as well as phenotypes. However, development of a reliable and accurate algorithm for merging heterogeneous information is highly needed as it could be captured all information of complex interactions on network that genes participate in. In this study we proposed a new method based on the non-negative matrix tri-factorization clustering method. We outlined two versions of the proposed method: two-source and three-source algorithms. Two-source algorithm aggregates individual deleteriousness prediction methods and PPI network, and three-source algorithm incorporates gene disease associations into the other sources already mentioned. Four benchmark datasets were employed for internally and externally validation of both algorithms of our predictor. The results at all datasets confirmed that, our method outperforms most state of the art variant prediction tools. Two key features of our variant effect prediction method are worth mentioning. Firstly, despite the fact that the incorporation of gene disease information at three-source algorithm can improve prediction performance by comparison with two-source algorithm, our method did not hinder by type 2 circularity error unlike some recent ensemble-based prediction methods. Type 2 circularity error occurs when the predictor annotates variants on the basis of the genes located on. Secondly, the performance of our predictor is superior over other ensemble-based methods for variants positioned on genes in which we do not have enough information about their pathogenicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.