Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34887317›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2021

Efficacy and safety of as-needed albuterol/budesonide versus albuterol in adults and children aged ≥4 years with moderate-to-severe asthma: rationale and design of the randomised, double-blind, active-controlled MANDALA study.

Bradley E Chipps, Frank C Albers, Laurence Reilly, Eva Johnsson, Christy Cappelletti, Alberto Papi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03769090 (A Long-term, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of PT027 Compared to PT007 Administered as Needed in Response to Symptoms in Symptomatic Adults and Children 4 Years of Age or Older With Asthma), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03769090 phase3completednot on this map

A Long-term, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of PT027 Compared to PT007 Administered as Needed in Response to Symptoms in Symptomatic Adults and Children 4 Years of Age or Older With Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorBond Avillion 2 Development LPRan2018 to 2022Enrolled3,132ConditionsAsthmaArmsBudesonide/albuterol sulfate metered-dose inhaler 160/180 μg, Budesonide/albuterol sulfate metered-dose inhaler 80/180 μg, Albuterol sulfate metered-dose inhaler 180 μg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bradley E ChippsSutter Medical Center Sacramento, Sacramento, California, USA.
Frank C AlbersAvillion US Inc, Northbrook, Illinois, USA frank@avillionllp.com.
Laurence ReillyAcumen Life Science Investment Consulting Limited, Tamworth, UK.
Eva JohnssonBioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca R&D Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Christy CappellettiBioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP Durham, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Alberto PapiRespiratory Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
AstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEAstraZeneca (United States) · USSutter Medical Center · USUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUncontrolled asthma is associated with substantial morbidity. While fast-acting bronchodilators provide quick relief from asthma symptoms, their use as rescue fails to address the underlying inflammation. Combining a short-acting beta METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Phase 3 MANDALA study was designed to determine the efficacy of albuterol in combination with budesonide (albuterol/budesonide 180/160 µg or 180/80 µg, two actuations of 90/80 µg or 90/40 µg, respectively) versus albuterol (180 µg, two actuations of 90 µg) as rescue therapy in adult, adolescent and paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. This event-driven study enrolled symptomatic patients (3000 adults/adolescents and 100 children aged 4-11 years) who experienced ≥1 severe asthma exacerbation in the previous year and were receiving maintenance therapy for ≥3 months prior to study entry. The primary efficacy endpoint was time-to-first severe asthma exacerbation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki, and that are consistent with International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use and Good Clinical Practice and the applicable regulatory requirements.

trial registrationNCT03769090.

Indexed as

AsthmaBudesonideAdministration, InhalationAdolescentAdultAlbuterolChildClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFormoterol FumarateHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAlbuterolBudesonideDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFormoterol Fumarateasthmaasthma in primary carepaediatric asthma

Identifiers

PMID34887317
PMCPMC8663093
OpenAlexW4200149753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.