Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34887246›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022

Percutaneous CT-Guided Core Needle Biopsies of Head and Neck Masses: Review of 184 Cases at a Single Academic Institution, Common and Special Techniques, Diagnostic Yield, and Safety.

R W Jordan, D P Shlapak, J C Benson, F E Diehn, D K Kim, V T Lehman, G B Liebo, A A Madhavan, J M Morris, P P Morris and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R W JordanFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-3580-7061
D P ShlapakFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota Shlapak.darya@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8704-4115
J C BensonFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-4038-5422
F E DiehnFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-9458-8017
D K KimFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-3696-2474
V T LehmanFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-8713-8293
G B LieboFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-8698
A A MadhavanFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-1794-4502
J M MorrisFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-5035-3910
P P MorrisFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-9013-5624
J T VerdoornFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-1592-1182
C M CarrFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-4585-2958
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePercutaneous CT-guided core needle biopsies of head and neck lesions can be safely performed with vigilant planning. This largest-to-date single-center retrospective study evaluates multiple approaches with consideration of special techniques and examines the histopathologic yield. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective review of CT-guided core biopsies of head and neck lesions from January 1, 2010, to October 30, 2020, was performed. We recorded the following: patient demographics, sedation details, biopsy needle type and size, lesion location and size, approach, patient positioning, preprocedural intravenous contrast, proceduralists' years of experience, complications, and pathology results.

resultsOne hundred eighty-four CT-guided core biopsies were evaluated. The initial diagnostic yield was 93% (171/184). However, of 43/184 (23%) originally "negative for malignancy" biopsies, 4 were eventually positive for malignancy via rebiopsy/excision, resulting in a 2% false-negative rate and an adjusted total diagnostic yield of 167/184 (91%). Biopsies were performed by 16 neuroradiologists with variable experience. The diagnostic yield was essentially the same: 91% (64/70) for proceduralists with ≤3 years' experience, and 90% (103/114) with >3 years' experience. The diagnostic yield was 93% (155/166) for lesions of >10 mm. The diagnostic yield per biopsy needle gauge was the following: 20 ga, 81% (13/16); 18 ga, 93% (70/75); 16 ga, 90% (64/71); and 14 ga, 91% (20/22). There were 4 asymptomatic hematomas, with none requiring intervention.

conclusionsPercutaneous CT-guided core needle biopsies are safe procedures for superficial and deep head and neck lesions with a high diagnostic yield. Careful planning and special techniques may increase the number of lesions accessible percutaneously while minimizing the risk of complications.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleHumansNeckRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34887246
PMCPMC8757546
OpenAlexW4200423265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.