Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886943›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2021

Neutralisation of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant sub-lineages AY.4.2 and B.1.617.2 with the mutation E484K by Comirnaty (BNT162b2 mRNA) vaccine-elicited sera, Denmark, 1 to 26 November 2021.

Ria Lassaunière, Charlotta Polacek, Jannik Fonager, Marc Bennedbæk, Lasse Boding, Morten Rasmussen, Anders Fomsgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ria LassaunièreVirus and Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotta PolacekVirus and Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jannik FonagerVirus and Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marc BennedbækVirus and Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lasse BodingDanish National Biobank, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten RasmussenVirus and Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders FomsgaardVirus and Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several factors may account for the recent increased spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta sub-lineage AY.4.2 in the United Kingdom, Romania, Poland, and Denmark. We evaluated the sensitivity of AY.4.2 to neutralisation by sera from 30 Comirnaty (BNT162b2 mRNA) vaccine recipients in Denmark in November 2021. AY.4.2 neutralisation was comparable to other circulating Delta lineages or sub-lineages. Conversely, the less prevalent B.1.617.2 with E484K showed a significant more than 4-fold reduction in neutralisation that warrants surveillance of strains with the acquired E484K mutation.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesDenmarkHumansMutationRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesRNA, MessengerVaccinesAY.4.2coronavirusCOVID-19DeltaE484K mutationSARS-CoV-2variantvirus neutralization

Identifiers

PMID34886943
PMCPMC8662802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.