ArticleArchives of physiotherapy2021
Protocol for a multicenter, randomised controlled trial of surgeon-directed home therapy vs. outpatient rehabilitation by physical therapists for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the SHORT trial.
Article in Archives of physiotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03719859 (Multicenter Randomized Trial of Home vs. Physical Therapist-Directed Rehabilitation for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter Randomized Trial of Home vs. Physical Therapist-Directed Rehabilitation for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Publicly available online activity restrictions after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate marked variability.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Exploring home-based rehabilitation experiences after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a health belief model-guided qualitative study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: Disease Burden, Current Understanding, and Gaps in Knowledge and Treatment.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Review
- Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms and Hybrid Computational Intelligence Algorithms for Rehabilitation Classification and Prognosis in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Factors influencing physical therapy utilization after shoulder surgery: a retrospective review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2023Article
- Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Were Not Adversely Affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic.Seminars in arthroplasty · 2023Article
- Article
- Optimizing Outcomes After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Rehabilitation, Expected Outcomes, and Maximizing Return to Activities.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has emerged as a successful surgery with expanding indications. Outcomes may be influenced by post-operative rehabilitation; however, there is a dearth of research regarding optimal rehabilitation strategy following RTSA. The primary purpose of this study is to compare patient reported and clinical outcomes after RTSA in two groups: in one group rehabilitation is directed by formal, outpatient clinic-based physical therapists (PT group) as compared to a home therapy group, in which patients are instructed in their rehabilitative exercises by surgeons at post-operative appointments (HT group). Secondary aims include comparisons of complications, cost of care and quality of life between the two groups.
methodsThis randomised controlled trial has commenced at seven sites across the United States. Data is being collected on 200 subjects by clinical research assistants pre-operatively and post-operatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 year visits. The following variables are being assessed: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), pain level using the numeric pain scale, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and shoulder active and passive range of motion for analysis of the primary aim. Chi square and t-tests will be used to measure differences in baseline characteristics of both groups. Repeated measures linear mixed effects modeling for measurement of differences will be used for outcomes associated with ASES and SANE and scores, and range of motion measures. Secondary aims will be analyzed for comparison of complications, cost, and quality of life assessment scores using data obtained from the PROMIS 29 v. 2, questionnaires administered at standard of care post-operative visits, and the electronic health record. Subjects will be allowed to crossover between the PT and HT groups, and analysis will include both intention-to-treat including patients who crossed over, and a second with cross-over patients removed, truncated to the time they crossed over. DISCUSSION: RTSA is being performed with increasing frequency, and the optimal rehabilitation strategy is unclear. This study will help clarify the role of formal physical therapy with particular consideration to outcomes, cost, and complications. In addition, this study will evaluate a proposed rehabilitation strategy.
trial registrationThis study is registered as NCT03719859 at ClincialTrials.gov .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.