Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886850›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2021

Implementing a low-threshold audio-only telehealth model for medication-assisted treatment of opioid use disorder at a community-based non-profit organization in Washington, D.C.

Ellis Jaewon Yeo, Hannah Kralles, David Sternberg, Dana McCullough, Ajetha Nadanasabesan, Richard Mayo, Hana Akselrod, Jillian Catalanotti

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ellis Jaewon YeoHIPS Clinic, 906 H Street, NE, Washington, DC, 20002, USA. ellisjyeo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1201-2204
Hannah KrallesHIPS Clinic, 906 H Street, NE, Washington, DC, 20002, USA.
David SternbergHIPS Clinic, 906 H Street, NE, Washington, DC, 20002, USA.
Dana McCulloughHIPS Clinic, 906 H Street, NE, Washington, DC, 20002, USA.
Ajetha NadanasabesanHIPS Clinic, 906 H Street, NE, Washington, DC, 20002, USA.
Richard MayoHIPS Clinic, 906 H Street, NE, Washington, DC, 20002, USA.
Hana AkselrodDepartment of Medicine, The George Washington University, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Jillian CatalanottiDepartment of Medicine, The George Washington University, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had especially devastating effects on people who use drugs. Due to pandemic protocols in the USA, medication-assisted treatment (MAT) regulations became more flexible, permitting our community-based nonprofit organization to transition its low-threshold MAT clinic to an audio-only telehealth model of care in 2020. Lessons learned have the potential to improve MAT delivery to people with OUD. CASE PRESENTATION: This case study describes our transition from a low-threshold community-based in-person MAT clinic to an audio-only telehealth model. We extracted data from electronic health records to describe patient characteristics and to calculate treatment retention rates. Patients were predominantly male (74.4%) and black (90.6%). The mean age was 53 years old with more than half of the clients aged 55 or older. Less than half (42.3%) of the patients lived in stable housing. Patients commonly had self-reported comorbid conditions such as hypertension (35.4%), hepatitis C (23.5%), diabetes (11.9%), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (7.2%). A majority of patients (68.6%) reported engagement with behavioral health care. We measure the success of our intervention relative to published retention rates, both overall as well as for in-person and telehealth care. In-person retention rates at 90- and 180-days were substantially higher than telehealth retention rates (93.9% vs 68.4% and 91.5% vs 51.9%, respectively).

conclusionsLow-threshold medication-assisted treatment in the care of people with opioid use disorder is essential to increasing treatment access and continuity. We found that an audio-only telehealth model was viable. Although we had decreased retention rates following the transition to an audio-only telehealth model, our rates remained excellent compared to published values for in-person MAT care. We call for advocacy and regulations to support continued use of telehealth services throughout and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Opioid-Related DisordersTelemedicineDistrict of ColumbiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentOrganizations, NonprofitPandemicsSARS-CoV-2BuprenorphineCOVID-19Harm reductionMedication-assisted treatmentOpioid use disorderTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID34886850
PMCPMC8655329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.