Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886569›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

How Helpful and What Is the Quality of Digital Sources of Healthy Lifestyle Information Used by Australian Adolescents? A Mixed Methods Study.

Matthew Armstrong, Nicole K Halim, Rebecca Raeside, Si Si Jia, Karice Hyun, Farzaneh Boroumand, Mariam Mandoh, Anna C Singleton, Philayrath Phongsavan, Julie Redfern and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Double-Edged Sword Perspective on Young Australians' Use of Social Media: A Structured Narrative Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Advancing adolescent health promotion in the digital era.Health promotion international · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Matthew ArmstrongEngagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia.
Nicole K HalimEngagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia.
Rebecca RaesideEngagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2016-6393
Si Si JiaEngagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia.
Karice HyunEngagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0164-7725
Farzaneh BoroumandEngagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia.
Mariam MandohEngagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2665-3806
Anna C SingletonEngagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia.
Philayrath PhongsavanPrevention Research Collaboration, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia.
Julie RedfernEngagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8707-5563
Stephanie R PartridgeEngagement and Co-Design Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Westmead 2145, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5390-3922

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the digital platforms most used by adolescents for healthy lifestyle information, perceived helpfulness of platform information, helpfulness for positive behaviour changes, and quality of platforms' lifestyle health information. Mixed-methods study including a cross-sectional online survey and content analysis. Eligible participants were 13-18-years; living in Australia; and had searched online for healthy lifestyle behaviour (nutrition, physical activity, weight management, sleep) information in the previous three months. Survey items examined the use of digital platforms, self-perceived helpfulness, usefulness for positive behaviour, and popular content. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression models. Content analysis was performed on popular digital content to evaluate expertise, objectivity, transparency, popularity, and relevance. In total, 297 participants completed the survey (62.3% female; 15.8 [SD1.5] years). Seventy-eight percent and 77% of participants reported using websites and social media, respectively, for seeking healthy lifestyle information. Websites and social media were rated as somewhat helpful by 43% and 46% of participants, respectively. Sixty-six percent and 53% of participants agreed/strongly agreed smartphone apps and social media were helpful for positive behaviour change, respectively. Helpfulness did not differ by age or gender. We evaluated 582 popular digital content; 38% were produced by a commercial company. Only 7% of content was from health organisations, 10% from health professionals and only 10% of content was objective, and 14% was transparent. Adolescents extensively utilise websites and social media for health information, yet popular content has limited objectivity and transparency. Governments and health organisations should consider creating age-appropriate digital information for healthy lifestyle behaviours.

Indexed as

Healthy LifestyleMobile ApplicationsAdolescentAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleHumansMaleadolescentschronic diseasenutritionobesityphysical activitypreventionsmartphone applicationssocial mediastreaming serviceswebsites

Identifiers

PMID34886569
PMCPMC8657837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.