Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886563›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Co-Design of a Neurodevelopment Assessment Scale: A Study Protocol.

Anne Masi, Syeda Ishra Azim, Christa Lam-Cassettari, Mark Dadds, Antonio Mendoza Diaz, Georgina Henry, Lisa Karlov, Ping-I Lin, Kylie-Ann Mallitt, Alicia Montgomery and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Co-design of the neurodevelopment assessment scale.Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne MasiSchool of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Syeda Ishra AzimSchool of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Christa Lam-CassettariSchool of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Mark DaddsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Antonio Mendoza DiazSchool of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Georgina HenryCerebral Palsy Alliance Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Lisa KarlovSchool of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Ping-I LinSchool of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Kylie-Ann MallittCentre for Big Data Research in Health, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Alicia MontgomerySchool of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Iva StrnadováSchool of Education, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8513-5400
Andrew WhitehouseTelethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia.
Valsamma EapenSchool of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6296-8306
UNSW Sydney · AUThe University of Sydney · AULiverpool Hospital · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental disorders are a heterogeneous group of conditions with overlapping symptomatology and fluctuating developmental trajectories that transcend current diagnostic categorisation. There is a need for validated screening instruments which dimensionally assess symptomatology from a holistic, transdiagnostic perspective. The primary aim is to co-design a Neurodevelopment Assessment Scale (NAS), a user-friendly transdiagnostic assessment inventory that systematically screens for all signs and symptoms commonly encountered in neurodevelopmental disorders. Our first objective is to undertake development of this tool, utilising co-design principles in partnership with stakeholders, including both those with lived experience of neurodevelopmental disorders and service providers. Our second objective is to evaluate the face validity, as well as the perceived utility, user-friendliness, suitability, and acceptability (i.e., 'social validity'), of the NAS from the perspective of parents/caregivers and adults with neurodevelopmental disorders, clinicians, and service providers. Our third objective is to ascertain the psychometric properties of the NAS, including content validity and convergent validity. The NAS will provide an efficient transdiagnostic tool for evaluating all relevant signs, symptoms, and the dimensional constructs that underpin neurodevelopmental presentations. It is anticipated that this will maximise outcomes by enabling the delivery of personalised care tailored to an individual's unique profile in a holistic and efficient manner.

Indexed as

CaregiversNeurodevelopmental DisordersAdultDelivery of Health CareHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of Resultsclinical phenotypeneurodevelopmental disordersneurodevelopment assessmentscale developmenttransdiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID34886563
PMCPMC8657806
OpenAlexW4200567185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.