Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886529›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Reconstructing Missing and Anomalous Data Collected from High-Frequency In-Situ Sensors in Fresh Waters.

Claire Kermorvant, Benoit Liquet, Guy Litt, Jeremy B Jones, Kerrie Mengersen, Erin E Peterson, Rob J Hyndman, Catherine Leigh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. >Water quality prediction of artificial intelligence model: a case of Huaihe River Basin, China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claire KermorvantLaboratoire de Mathématiques et de Leurs Applications de Pau Fédération MIRA, UMR CNRS 5142, Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, 64600 Anglet, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1972-8937
Benoit LiquetLaboratoire de Mathématiques et de Leurs Applications de Pau Fédération MIRA, UMR CNRS 5142, Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, 64600 Anglet, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8136-2294
Guy LittNational Ecological Observatory Network, Battelle Boulder, Boulder, CO 80301, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1996-7468
Jeremy B JonesInstitute of Arctic Biology and Department of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA.
Kerrie MengersenSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Erin E PetersonARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematics and Statistical Frontiers, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Rob J HyndmanARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematics and Statistical Frontiers, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2140-5352
Catherine LeighARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematics and Statistical Frontiers, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4186-1678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In situ sensors that collect high-frequency data are used increasingly to monitor aquatic environments. These sensors are prone to technical errors, resulting in unrecorded observations and/or anomalous values that are subsequently removed and create gaps in time series data. We present a framework based on generalized additive and auto-regressive models to recover these missing data. To mimic sporadically missing (i) single observations and (ii) periods of contiguous observations, we randomly removed (i) point data and (ii) day- and week-long sequences of data from a two-year time series of nitrate concentration data collected from Arikaree River, USA, where synoptically collected water temperature, turbidity, conductance, elevation, and dissolved oxygen data were available. In 72% of cases with missing point data, predicted values were within the sensor precision interval of the original value, although predictive ability declined when sequences of missing data occurred. Precision also depended on the availability of other water quality covariates. When covariates were available, even a sudden, event-based peak in nitrate concentration was reconstructed well. By providing a promising method for accurate prediction of missing data, the utility and confidence in summary statistics and statistical trends will increase, thereby assisting the effective monitoring and management of fresh waters and other at-risk ecosystems.

Indexed as

EcosystemWater QualityEnvironmental MonitoringFresh WaterNitrogen OxidesRiversNitrogen Oxidesanomaly correctiongeneralised additive model (GAM)missing data reconstructionremote sensingwater quality

Identifiers

PMID34886529
PMCPMC8657025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.