Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886407›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Effect of Forest Therapy on Depression and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Poung-Sik Yeon, Jin-Young Jeon, Myeong-Seo Jung, Gyeong-Min Min, Ga-Yeon Kim, Kyung-Mi Han, Min-Ja Shin, Seong-Hee Jo, Jin-Gun Kim, Won-Sop Shin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06601920 (A Study of Activity Leader to Forest Therapy Campaign in Different Environments Targets on the Participants Which Had Been Infected by SARS-COV-2), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06601920 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Study of Activity Leader to Forest Therapy Campaign in Different Environments Targets on the Participants Which Had Been Infected by SARS-COV-2

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaipei City HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled161ConditionsPost COVID-19 Syndrome, Stress Disorders, Life Quality, Depression Anxiety DisorderArmsForest healing activities
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Effects of Urban Forest Therapy Program on Depression Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Poung-Sik YeonDepartment of Forest Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
Jin-Young JeonGraduated Department of Forest Therapy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9081-1725
Myeong-Seo JungGraduated Department of Forest Therapy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
Gyeong-Min MinGraduated Department of Forest Therapy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
Ga-Yeon KimGraduated Department of Forest Therapy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
Kyung-Mi HanGraduated Department of Forest Therapy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
Min-Ja ShinGraduated Department of Forest Therapy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.
Seong-Hee JoNational Center for Forest Therapy, Yeongju 36043, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6153-8408
Jin-Gun KimKorea Forest Therapy Forum Incorporated Association, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4023-3872
Won-Sop ShinDepartment of Forest Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5665-1502
Chungbuk National University · KRKorea Forest Service · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the effects of forest therapy on depression and anxiety using data obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies. We searched SCOPUS, PubMed, MEDLINE(EBSCO), Web of science, Embase, Korean Studies Information Service System, Research Information Sharing Service, and DBpia to identify relevant studies published from January 1990 to December 2020 and identified 20 relevant studies for the synthesis. The methodological quality of eligible primary studies was assessed by ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I. Most primary studies were conducted in the Republic of Korea except for one study in Poland. Overall, forest therapy significantly improved depression (Hedges's g = 1.133; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.491 to -0.775) and anxiety (Hedges's g = 1.715; 95% CI: -2.519 to -0.912). The quality assessment resulted in five RCTs that raised potential concerns in three and high risk in two. Fifteen quasi-experimental studies raised high for nine quasi-experimental studies and moderate for six studies. In conclusion, forest therapy is preventive management and non-pharmacologic treatment to improve depression and anxiety. However, the included studies lacked methodological rigor and required more comprehensive geographic application. Future research needs to determine optimal forest characteristics and systematic activities that can maximize the improvement of depression and anxiety.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionAnxiety DisordersForestsHumansPolandanxietydepressionforest therapymeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID34886407
PMCPMC8657257
OpenAlexW3216488676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.