Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886374›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Organizational Health Literacy in a Hospital-Insights on the Patients' Perspective.

Johanna Sophie Lubasch, Mona Voigt-Barbarowicz, Nicole Ernstmann, Christoph Kowalski, Anna Levke Brütt, Lena Ansmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johanna Sophie LubaschDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-1816
Mona Voigt-BarbarowiczDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6174-4909
Nicole ErnstmannCenter for Health Communication and Health Services Research (CHSR), Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Christoph KowalskiGerman Cancer Society (DKG), 14057 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7438-4321
Anna Levke BrüttDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Lena AnsmannDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health literacy-sensitive communication has been found to be an important dimension of organizational health literacy measured from the patients' perspective. Little is known about the role of health literacy-sensitive communication in complex care structures. Therefore, our aim was to assess which hospital characteristics (in terms of process organization) and patient characteristics (e.g., age, chronic illness, etc.) contribute to better perceptions of health literacy-sensitive communication, as well as whether better health literacy-sensitive communication is associated with better patient reported experiences. Data were derived from a patient survey conducted in 2020 in four clinical departments of a university hospital in Germany. Health literacy-sensitive communication was measured with the HL-COM scale. Data from 209 patients (response rate 24.2%) were analyzed with a structural equation model (SEM). Results revealed that no patient characteristics were associated with HL-COM scores. Better process organization as perceived by patients was associated with significantly better HL-COM scores, and, in turn, better HL-COM scores were associated with more patient-reported social support provided by physicians and nurses as well as fewer unmet information needs. Investing into good process organization might improve health literacy-sensitive communication, which in turn has the potential to foster the patient-provider relationship as well as to reduce unmet information needs of patients.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationHealth LiteracyCommunicationGermanyHospitalsHumansProfessional-Patient Relationshealth literacy-sensitive communicationHL-COMinformation needspatient–professional relationshippatient survey

Identifiers

PMID34886374
PMCPMC8656520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.