Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886323›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Brazilian Food Banks: Overview and Perspectives.

Natalia Tenuta, Thaís Barros, Romero Alves Teixeira, Rômulo Paes-Sousa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natalia TenutaRené Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (IRR-Fiocruz), Belo Horizonte 30190-002, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9891-3435
Thaís BarrosDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina 39100-000, Brazil.
Romero Alves TeixeiraDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina 39100-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6623-8239
Rômulo Paes-SousaRené Rachou Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (IRR-Fiocruz), Belo Horizonte 30190-002, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades food banks have become a worldwide response to the contradicting the coexistence of food losses and waste, on the one hand, and hunger and food insecurity on the other. In Brazil, food banks had a rapid expansion, becoming the object of public policy on Food and Nutrition Security and of non-profit private institutions. Our study presents an unprecedented overview of all the food banks currently active in the Brazilian territory, discussing their performances and perspectives. We conducted descriptive research, aiming to characterize the number, spatial distribution, performance, and modalities of operation of the Brazilian food banks. We mapped 217 active food banks and they all participated in the study. The results revealed the important capillarity of the food banks, which exist in all 27 Brazilian federative units, but also demonstrate the potential and need for expansion. Most of the Brazilian food banks has commercial establishments as their largest donor partners and have fruits and vegetables as their most donated items. They mostly complement the feeding of families at social risk and children served by social institutions. Food and nutrition education actions are offered by all the studied units to donor partners and beneficiary institutions and families.

Indexed as

Food SupplyVegetablesBrazilChildHumansHungerNutritional StatusBrazilfood and nutrition educationfood banksfood losses and wastefood security

Identifiers

PMID34886323
PMCPMC8657059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.