Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886279›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Obstetric Violence as an Infringement on Basic Bioethical Principles. Reflections Inspired by Focus Groups with Midwives.

Júlia Martín-Badia, Noemí Obregón-Gutiérrez, Josefina Goberna-Tricas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Obstetric violence: A public health concern.Health science reports · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Júlia Martín-BadiaDepartment of Philosophy, University of Barcelona, 08001 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2130-9085
Noemí Obregón-GutiérrezUniversity Hospital Parc Taulí, Sabadell, 08208 Barcelona, Spain.
Josefina Goberna-TricasDepartment of Public Health, Mental Health and Perinatal Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, ADHUC-Research Center for Theory, Gender and Sexuality, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3531-9009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundobstetric violence is still far too invisible; the word "violence" generates rejection and obstetric violence is complex to define and typify, as it is a subjective experience. It has been widely analyzed from legal, sociological, and clinical perspectives, but not equally so from the bioethical point of view. This article sets out to take a more in-depth look at the experiences of midwives in order to describe the ethical perspectives of obstetric violence. We intend to describe the effects that malpractice and violence within obstetric care have on American and European bioethical principles. METHODOLOGY: A qualitative methodology of the phenomenological tradition was used: 24 midwives participated in three focus groups. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: four categories were arrived at; they are "the maleficence of forgetting my vulnerability", "beneficence requires respect for my integrity and dignity", "my autonomy is being removed from me" and "a problem of social justice towards us, women".

conclusionobstetric violence infringes on the main bioethical principles (non-maleficence, beneficence, autonomy, justice, vulnerability, dignity, and integrity). Beyond whether it is called violence or not, what matters from an ethical perspective is that, as long as women have such negative experiences during pregnancy and childbirth, obstetric care needs better humanizing.

Indexed as

MidwiferyDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFocus GroupsHumansParturitionPregnancyViolencebioethicschildbirth careethical aspectshumanizationmalpracticemidwivesobstetric violencewomen

Identifiers

PMID34886279
PMCPMC8656655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.