Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886274›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Use of mHealth in Orthopedic Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Sara Dionisi, Noemi Giannetta, Emanuele Di Simone, Francesco Ricciardi, Gloria Liquori, Aurora De Leo, Lorenzo Moretti, Christian Napoli, Marco Di Muzio, Giovanni Battista Orsi

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Sensors and digital medicine in orthopaedic surgery.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sara DionisiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Noemi GiannettaFaculty of Philosophy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Emanuele Di SimoneNursing, Technical, Rehabilitation, Assistance and Research Department, IRCCS Istituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri-IFO, 00144 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6373-8163
Francesco RicciardiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Gloria LiquoriDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-3740
Aurora De LeoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo MorettiOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Christian NapoliDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5775-2276
Marco Di MuzioDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2641-4044
Giovanni Battista OrsiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9246-6216
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITAzienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Consorziale - Policlinico Bari · ITIstituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: It is well known that the success of surgical procedures is related to optimal postoperative management and follow-up. In this regard, mHealth technologies could potentially improve perioperative care. Based on these considerations, the objective of this scoping review is to evaluate the current status and use of mHealth interventions designed to provide perioperative care in orthopedic surgery. (2) Methods: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement (Extension for Scoping Review) and follows the framework of Arskey and O'Malley. (3) Results: The use of mHealth in the surgical setting is mainly oriented towards the development of applications for monitoring post-operative pain and optimizing communication between the various health professionals involved in patient care. (4) Conclusions: The mHealth systems can have a positive impact both on patient participation in the therapeutic process and on the communication between health professionals, increasing the quality of care.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsTelemedicineHumansTechnologymHealthmobile applicationorthopedic surgery

Identifiers

PMID34886274
PMCPMC8657184
OpenAlexW3217070331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.