Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886259›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Development and Validation of the Depression Inventory for Type 1 Diabetes (DID-1).

Mónica Carreira, María Soledad Ruiz de Adana, Marta Domínguez, Sergio Valdés, Maria Cruz Almaraz, Gabriel Olveira, María Teresa Anarte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mónica CarreiraDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2059-100X
María Soledad Ruiz de AdanaInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Marta DomínguezInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Sergio ValdésInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Maria Cruz AlmarazInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Gabriel OlveiraInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain.
María Teresa AnarteDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-4644
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are more likely to have depression than the general population and their prognosis is worse. Unfortunately, the characteristics of persons with T1D lead to inadequate screening for depression in this population. To aid in the detection of depression in this population, this study was undertaken to develop a depressive symptoms assessment instrument specific to patients with T1D and to examine its psychometric properties. A total of 207 people with T1D participated in this study. The reliability of the new scale was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and the Spearman-Brown split-half coefficient. The Depression Inventory for type 1 Diabetes (DID-1), composed of 45 items on a Likert scale (1-7), shows high internal and temporal consistency, as well as adequate concurrent, convergent and discriminant validity. Factor analysis identified 7 factors (Symptoms of depression, Diminished interest, Hopelessness and dissatisfaction, Guilt, Fear, frustration and irritability, Defenselessness, and Interference in daily life) that explained 61.612% of the total variability. The cut-off score for diagnosis was set at 155 points. It was concluded that the DID-1 scale is a reliable, valid and useful tool for the assessment of depressive symptoms, eliminating the bias of other nonspecific diabetes scales.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1DepressionFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsdepressionDepression Inventory for type 1 Diabetesdepressive symptomsscale developmenttype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID34886259
PMCPMC8657055
OpenAlexW3215310462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.