Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886254›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Electronic Health Literacy in Individuals with Chronic Pain and Its Association with Psychological Function.

Elena Castarlenas, Elisabet Sánchez-Rodríguez, Rubén Roy, Catarina Tomé-Pires, Ester Solé, Mark P Jensen, Jordi Miró

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena CastarlenasUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Psychology, Research Center for Behavior Assessment (CRAMC), Chair in Pediatric Pain Universitat Rovira i Virgili-Fudación Grünenthal, Unit for the Study and Treatment of Pain-ALGOS, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0383-2526
Elisabet Sánchez-RodríguezUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Psychology, Research Center for Behavior Assessment (CRAMC), Chair in Pediatric Pain Universitat Rovira i Virgili-Fudación Grünenthal, Unit for the Study and Treatment of Pain-ALGOS, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8377-1799
Rubén RoyUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Psychology, Research Center for Behavior Assessment (CRAMC), Chair in Pediatric Pain Universitat Rovira i Virgili-Fudación Grünenthal, Unit for the Study and Treatment of Pain-ALGOS, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3813-762X
Catarina Tomé-PiresUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Psychology, Research Center for Behavior Assessment (CRAMC), Chair in Pediatric Pain Universitat Rovira i Virgili-Fudación Grünenthal, Unit for the Study and Treatment of Pain-ALGOS, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.
Ester SoléUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Psychology, Research Center for Behavior Assessment (CRAMC), Chair in Pediatric Pain Universitat Rovira i Virgili-Fudación Grünenthal, Unit for the Study and Treatment of Pain-ALGOS, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.
Mark P JensenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Jordi MiróUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Psychology, Research Center for Behavior Assessment (CRAMC), Chair in Pediatric Pain Universitat Rovira i Virgili-Fudación Grünenthal, Unit for the Study and Treatment of Pain-ALGOS, 43007 Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1998-6653
Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud · ESUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health literacy skills and competences are important for empowering people to have an active role in making appropriate health care decisions. The aims of this cross-sectional study were to (1) examine the frequency of use of the Internet for seeking online information about chronic pain, (2) determine the level of eHealth literacy skills in the study sample, (3) identify the factors most closely associated with higher levels of eHealth literacy, and (4) examine self-efficacy as a potential mediator of the association between eHealth literacy and measures of pain and function in a sample of adults with chronic pain. One-hundred and sixty-one adults with chronic pain completed measures assessing internet use, eHealth literacy, pain interference, anxiety, depression, and pain-related self-efficacy. Results indicated that 70% of the participants are active users of the Internet for seeking information related to their health. The level of eHealth literacy skills was not statistically significantly associated with participants' age or pain interference but was significantly negatively associated with both anxiety and depression. In addition, the findings showed that self-efficacy fully explained the relationship between eHealth literacy and depression and partially explained the relationship between eHealth literacy and anxiety. Self-efficacy should be considered as a treatment target in eHealth literacy interventions, due to its role in explaining the potential benefits of eHealth literacy.

Indexed as

Chronic PainHealth LiteracyTelemedicineAdultCross-Sectional StudiesElectronicsHumansInternetSurveys and Questionnaireschronic paineHealth literacypsychological functionself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID34886254
PMCPMC8656597
OpenAlexW3216517956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.