Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886231›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Effects of Seven-Year Fertilization Reclamation on Bacterial Community in a Coal Mining Subsidence Area in Shanxi, China.

Li Li, Tingliang Li, Huisheng Meng, Yinghe Xie, Jie Zhang, Jianping Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of Land Reclamation on Soil Bacterial Community and Potential Functions in Bauxite Mining Area.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Profile of Bacterial Community and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Typical Vegetable Greenhouse Soil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li LiCollege of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Tingliang LiCollege of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Huisheng MengCollege of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Yinghe XieCollege of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Jie ZhangCollege of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Jianping HongCollege of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The restoration of soil fertility and microbial communities is the key to the soil reclamation and ecological reconstruction in coal mine subsidence areas. However, the response of soil bacterial communities to reclamation is still not well understood. Here, we studied the bacterial communities in fertilizer-reclaimed soil (CK, without fertilizer; CF, chemical fertilizer; M, manure) in the Lu'an reclamation mining region and compared them with those in adjacent subsidence soil (SU) and farmland soil (FA). We found that the compositions of dominant phyla in the reclaimed soil differed greatly from those in the subsidence soil and farmland soil (

Indexed as

Coal MiningBacteriaChinaCoalFertilizationMiningPlanctomycetesSoilSoil MicrobiologyCoalSoilbacterial communitybacterial diversitycoal mininghigh-throughput sequencingsoil reclamation

Identifiers

PMID34886231
PMCPMC8656652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.