Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886211›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Multilevel Determinants of Integrated Service Delivery for Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health in Humanitarian Settings.

M Claire Greene, Clarisa Bencomo, Susan Rees, Peter Ventevogel, Samuel Likindikoki, Ashley Nemiro, Annie Bonz, Jessie K K Mbwambo, Wietse A Tol, Terry M McGovern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

M Claire GreeneHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4631-4764
Clarisa BencomoHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Susan ReesSchool of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2033, Australia.
Peter VentevogelPublic Health Section, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Rue de Montbrillant 94, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland.
Samuel LikindikokiDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, United Nations Road, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 65001, Tanzania.
Ashley NemiroThe MHPSS Collaborative, Rosenørns Allé 12, 1634 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annie BonzHIAS, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.
Jessie K K MbwamboDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, United Nations Road, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 65001, Tanzania.
Wietse A TolDepartment of Public Health, Global Health Section, University of Copenhagen, Nørregade 10, 1165 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Terry M McGovernHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Columbia University · USMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZOffice of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees · CHUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Tuberculosis Research Institute at MUHASD43TW009573 · FIC · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ADAMS, LISA VIRGINIA · 2013 to 2022
$3.0M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inter-agency guidelines recommend that survivors of intimate partner violence in humanitarian settings receive multisectoral services consistent with a survivor-centered approach. Providing integrated services across sectors is challenging, and aspirations often fall short in practice. In this study, we explore factors that influence the implementation of a multisectoral, integrated intervention intended to reduce psychological distress and intimate partner violence in Nyarugusu Refugee Camp, Tanzania. We analyzed data from a desk review of donor, legal, and policy documents; a gender-based violence services mapping conducted through 15 interviews and 6 focus group discussions; and a qualitative process evaluation with 29 stakeholders involved in the implementation of the integrated psychosocial program. We identified the challenges of implementing a multisectoral, integrated intervention for refugee survivors of intimate partner violence at the structural, inter-institutional, intra-institutional, and in social and interpersonal levels. Key determinants of successful implementation included the legal context, financing, inter-agency coordination, engagement and ownership, and the ability to manage competing priorities. Implementing a multisectoral, integrated response for survivors of intimate partner violence is complex and influenced by interrelated factors from policy and financing to institutional and stakeholder engagement. Further investment in identifying strategies to overcome the existing challenges of implementing multisectoral approaches that align with global guidelines is needed to effectively address the burden of intimate partner violence in humanitarian settings.

Indexed as

Gender-Based ViolenceIntimate Partner ViolenceRefugeesHumansMental HealthSurvivorsgender-based violencehumanitarianintegrated careintimate partner violencemental healthmultisectoral

Identifiers

PMID34886211
PMCPMC8656517
OpenAlexW3217437514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.