Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886204›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Use of E-Health in Dutch General Practice during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Jelle Keuper, Ronald Batenburg, Robert Verheij, Lilian van Tuyl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jelle KeuperNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-3430
Ronald BatenburgNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9453-481X
Robert VerheijNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lilian van TuylNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4792-895X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced general practices to search for possibilities to provide healthcare remotely (e.g., e-health). In this study, the impact of the pandemic on the use of e-health in general practices in the Netherlands was investigated. In addition, the intention of practices to continue using e-health more intensively and differences in the use of e-health between practice types were investigated. For this purpose, web surveys were sent to general practices in April and July 2020. Descriptive data analysis was performed and differences in the use of e-health between practice types were tested using one-way ANOVA. Response rates were 34% (

Indexed as

COVID-19General PracticeTelemedicineHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19e-healthgeneral practice

Identifiers

PMID34886204
PMCPMC8656482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.