Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886140›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Open Issues and Practical Suggestions for Telemedicine in Chronic Pain.

Marco Cascella, Franco Marinangeli, Alessandro Vittori, Cristina Scala, Massimo Piccinini, Alessandro Braga, Luca Miceli, Renato Vellucci

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Transforming Chronic Pain Care Through Telemedicine: An Italian Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Editorial to the Special Issue: "Recent Advances in the Management of Chronic Pain".International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marco CascellaDivision of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5236-3132
Franco MarinangeliDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Alessandro VittoriDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ARCO, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2377-3765
Cristina ScalaUOC Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Senigallia Hospital, 60123 Ancona, Italy.
Massimo PiccininiAnesthesia, Critical Care, Palliative Medicine and Pain Therapy Service, L'Aquila ASL1 Abruzzo, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Alessandro BragaGrunenthal, Italia srl, 20019 Milan, Italy.
Luca MiceliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Pain Medicine, IRCCS CRO of Aviano, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
Renato VellucciPain and Palliative Care Clinic, University Hospital of Careggi, 50121 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5462-7920
University of L'Aquila · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine represents a major opportunity to facilitate continued assistance for patients with chronic pain and improve their access to care. Preliminary data show that an improvement can be expected of the monitoring, treatment adherence, assessment of treatment effect including the emotional distress associated with pain. Moreover, this approach seems to be convenient and cost-effective, and particularly suitable for personalized treatment. Nevertheless, several open issues must be highlighted such as identification of assessment tools, implementation of monitoring instruments, and ability to evaluate personal needs and expectations. Open questions exist, such as how to evaluate the need for medical intervention and interventional procedures, and how to define when a clinical examination is required for certain conditions. In this context, it is necessary to establish dynamic protocols that provide the right balance between face-to-face visits and telemedicine. Useful tips are provided to start an efficient experience. More data are needed to develop precise operating procedures. In the meantime, the first experiences from such settings can pave the way to initiate effective care pathways in chronic pain.

Indexed as

Chronic PainTelemedicineHumanschronic painfunctionalityhealthcare deliveryhealth-related quality of lifetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34886140
PMCPMC8656645
OpenAlexW3217467063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.