Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886133›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Cervical Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) and Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus Screening in Rural Indigenous Guatemalan Women: Time to Rethink VIA.

Anne Jeffries, Consuelo M Beck-Sagué, Ariel Bernardo Marroquin-Garcia, Michael Dean, Virginia McCoy, Diego Aurelio Cordova-Toma, Eric Fenkl, Purnima Madhivanan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne JeffriesRobert Stempel (RS) College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University (FIU), Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Consuelo M Beck-SaguéRobert Stempel (RS) College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University (FIU), Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Ariel Bernardo Marroquin-GarciaPartner for Surgery, McLean, VA 22101, USA.
Michael DeanLaboratory of Translational Genomics, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2234-0631
Virginia McCoyRobert Stempel (RS) College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University (FIU), Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Diego Aurelio Cordova-TomaPartner for Surgery, McLean, VA 22101, USA.
Eric FenklRobert Stempel (RS) College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University (FIU), Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Purnima MadhivananMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7818-3394
University of Miami · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-visit "screen-and-treat" strategies using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and cryotherapy (liquid nitrous oxide ablation) in low-resource settings are commonly used to detect and treat precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention. This study compared VIA sensitivity and specificity in rural indigenous Guatemalan communities, to that of oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for detection of precancerous changes, using cytology as the reference standard. Between 3-8 September 2017, trained nurses examined 222 women aged 23-58 years with VIA. Specimens for liquid-based cytology and HPV testing were obtained prior to VIA with a cytobrush and transported in PreservCyt to a US clinical laboratory. VIA and HPV test sensitivities were assessed as proportions of women with abnormal cytology that had abnormal VIA or HPV results, respectively, and specificities, as proportions with normal cytology with normal VIA or negative HPV tests. Of 222 women, 18 (8.1%) had abnormal cytology (1 carcinoma in a participant who received VIA-based cryotherapy in 2015, 4 high- and 5 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and 8 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS)). Excluding ASCUS, sensitivities of VIA and HPV were 20.0% and 100%, respectively. VIA-based screening may not be acceptable for detecting precancerous lesions, and field cryotherapy for preventing malignancy. The World Health Organization recommended in 2021 "…using HPV DNA detection as the primary screening test rather than VIA or cytology".

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAcetic AcidEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLaboratories, ClinicalMass ScreeningPapillomaviridaeSensitivity and SpecificityVaginal SmearsAcetic Acidcervical cancer screeningcryotherapycytologyGuatemalahuman papillomaviruslow- and middle-income countrieslow-resource settingsvisual inspection with acetic acid

Identifiers

PMID34886133
PMCPMC8656883
OpenAlexW3216693311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.