Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886128›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Support of the Implementation of a Whistleblowing System for Smoke-Free Environments: A Mixed Methods Approach.

Al Asyary, Meita Veruswati, La Ode Hasnuddin S Sagala, La Ode Ahmad Saktiansyah, Dewi Susanna, Hanns Moshammer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Examining Whistleblowing Intention: The Influence of Rationalization on Wrongdoing and Threat of Retaliation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Al AsyaryDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.
Meita VeruswatiStudy Program of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jakarta 12130, Indonesia.
La Ode Hasnuddin S SagalaStudy Program of Information System, Faculty of Information and Technology, Universitas SembilanBelas November, Kolaka 93561, Indonesia.
La Ode Ahmad SaktiansyahStudy Program of Public Health Science, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari 93232, Indonesia.
Dewi SusannaDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-1995-5478
Hanns MoshammerDepartment of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2235-0645
University of Indonesia · IDKarakalpak State University · UZUniversitas Halu Oleo · IDUniversitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr Hamka · IDUniversitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enforcement of a smoke-free policy is of vital concern in support of the health of smokers and bystanders. Indonesia has issued a smoke-free law, but implementation and enforcement lie with the regional and municipal governments. In a survey of 225 respondents recruited via schools, knowledge about the health effects of smoking and the smoke-free regulation, as well as attitudes towards and commitment and support of the enforcement of the smoke-free regulation in the Kendari City through an electronic whistleblowing system was examined. Furthermore, the participants were asked about the smoking status and smoking behavior. About half of the respondents were students (teenagers), the other half-their parents. Male respondents were strongly overrepresented (85%). Only 18% of the respondents declared to be smokers, mostly adults and males. Both the smokers and the non-smokers supported the smoke-free law and its enforcement through a whistleblowing system. Representatives of the local government were interviewed and participated in focus group discussions. In general, they also exhibited strong support of an electronic enforcement tool. However, issues of efficiency, costs, and responsibility must still be resolved. Nevertheless, an electronic whistleblowing system has the potential to further the health and livelihoods in a community like the Kendari City.

Indexed as

Smoke-Free PolicyTobacco Smoke PollutionAdolescentAdultHumansMaleSmokingStudentsWhistleblowingTobacco Smoke PollutionIndonesialaw enforcementsmoke-free policywhistleblowing

Identifiers

PMID34886128
PMCPMC8656714
OpenAlexW3216395709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.