Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886109›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Theoretical Foundations to the Impact of Dog-Related Activities on Human Hedonic Well-Being, Life Satisfaction and Eudaimonic Well-Being.

Ana Maria Barcelos, Niko Kargas, John Maltby, Sophie Hall, Phil Assheton, Daniel S Mills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical Animal Behaviour: Paradigms, Problems and Practice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Maria BarcelosSchool of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2727-5058
Niko KargasSchool of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK.
John MaltbyDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0621-9359
Sophie HallSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9847-8269
Phil AsshetonDepartment of Statistics, StatsAdvice.com, Ltd., 10551 Berlin, Germany.
Daniel S MillsSchool of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4765-9625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-sectional comparisons of well-being between dog owners and non-owners commonly generate inconsistent results. Focusing on the uniqueness of the relationship might help address this issue and provide a stronger foundation for dog-related psychotherapeutic interventions. This study aims to evaluate the impact of dog-related activities (e.g., exercising the dog) on owner hedonic well-being, life satisfaction and eudaimonic well-being. It was also hypothesised that psychological closeness to the dog would affect these well-being outcomes. For this study, 1030 dog owners aged over 18 years old answered an online questionnaire about the impact of 15 groups of dog-related activities on their well-being. Ordinal regressions were used to estimate the mean response (and its uncertainty) for each outcome, while conditioning for psychological closeness to the dog and controlling for several key covariates. Tactile interactions and dog playing were significantly more beneficial than other activities for hedonic well-being, and dog training and dog presence for eudaimonic well-being. In contrast, dog health issues and behavioural problems were linked to decrements in these well-being outcomes. Higher psychological closeness to the dog predicted greater improvement in well-being in positive dog-related activities. Our quantitative study validates the general findings of previous qualitative work and lays the groundwork for future longitudinal studies.

Indexed as

Personal SatisfactionAdultAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesDogsHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesdog ownershipdog-related activitieseudaimonichedonichuman-animal interactionslife satisfactionmental healthwell-being

Identifiers

PMID34886109
PMCPMC8656591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.