Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34886007›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands-Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies.

Matilda Wollter Bergman, Cecilia Berlin, Maral Babapour Chafi, Ann-Christine Falck, Roland Örtengren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matilda Wollter BergmanDepartment of Industrial and Materials Science, Division of Design & Human Factors, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Cecilia BerlinDepartment of Industrial and Materials Science, Division of Design & Human Factors, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5736-8522
Maral Babapour ChafiDepartment of Industrial and Materials Science, Division of Design & Human Factors, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ann-Christine FalckDepartment of Industrial and Materials Science, Division of Production Systems, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Roland ÖrtengrenDepartment of Industrial and Materials Science, Division of Production Systems, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In manufacturing companies, cognitive processing is required from assembly workers to perform correct and timely assembly of complex products, often with varied specifications and high quality demands. This paper explores assembly operators' perceptions of cognitive/mental workload to provide a holistic understanding of the work conditions that affect cognitive demands and performance. While the physical loading aspects of assembly work are well known, most empirical literature dealing with cognitive/mental loading in manufacturing tends to examine a few particular aspects, rather than address the issue with a holistic system view. This semi-structured interview study, involving 50 industrial assembly operators from three Swedish companies, explores how assemblers perceive that their cognitive performance and well-being is influenced by a wide variety of factors within the context of mechanical product assembly. The interview transcripts were analysed using a priori coding, followed by bottom-up Thematic Analysis. The results indicate that a variety of systemic effects on assemblers' cognitive performance can be classified as job demands or resources. Quite often, the absence of a resource mirrors a related demand, and "good assembly conditions", as described by the interviewees, often re-frame demands as desirable challenges that foster motivation and positive feelings towards the work. The identified demands and resources stem from task design, timing, physical loading, intrinsic and extrinsic motivators, social teamwork and the product's "interface" design. Despite organisational differences and conditions between the three companies that took part in the study, the results are largely consistent.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsWorkloadHumansIndustryJob SatisfactionMental ProcessesQualitative Researchcognitive ergonomicscognitive performancehuman factorsmanual assemblymental workloadoccupational ergonomicswork environment

Identifiers

PMID34886007
PMCPMC8656480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.