Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34885990›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Optimization of SPME-Arrow-GC/MS Method for Determination of Free and Bound Volatile Organic Compounds from Grape Skins.

Iva Šikuten, Petra Štambuk, Jasminka Karoglan Kontić, Edi Maletić, Ivana Tomaz, Darko Preiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. HiSorb-TD-GC-MS analysis of commercial CBD oils.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The MoroccanFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect of Sequential Fermentation withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iva ŠikutenDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-3396-1276
Petra ŠtambukDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-5480-6737
Jasminka Karoglan KontićDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Edi MaletićDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivana TomazDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0001-6773-5309
Darko PreinerDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-4598-2207

Funding

Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb CoE CroP-BioDiv KK.01.1.1.01.005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Solid phase microextraction (SPME)-Arrow is a new extraction technology recently employed in the analysis of volatiles in food materials. Grape volatile organic compounds (VOC) have a crucial role in the winemaking industry due to their sensory characteristics of wine.; (2) Methods: Box-Behnken experimental design and response surface methodology were used to optimise SPME-Arrow conditions (extraction temperature, incubation time, exposure time, desorption time). Analyzed VOCs were free VOCs directly from grape skins and bound VOCs released from grape skins by acid hydrolysis.; (3) Results: The most significant factors were extraction temperature and exposure time for both free and bound VOCs. For both factors, an increase in their values positively affected the extraction efficiency for almost all classes of VOCs. For free VOCs, the optimum extraction conditions are: extraction temperature 60 °C, incubation time 20 min, exposure time 49 min, and desorption time 7 min, while for the bound VOCs are: extraction temperature 60 °C, incubation time 20 min, exposure time 60 min, desorption time 7 min.; (4) Conclusions: Application of the optimized method provides a powerful tool in the analysis of major classes of volatile organic compounds from grape skins, which can be applied to a large number of samples.

Indexed as

AcidsAlcoholsCrops, AgriculturalGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHot TemperatureMonoterpenesNorisoprenoidsPlant ExtractsSolid Phase MicroextractionVitisVolatile Organic CompoundsWineAcidsAlcoholsMonoterpenesNorisoprenoidsPlant ExtractsVolatile Organic Compoundsgrape skinsSPME-Arrowvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID34885990
PMCPMC8659239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.