ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Hemodynamics Challenges for the Navigation of Medical Microbots for the Treatment of CVDs.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Theranostic Applications of Microrobots: Integrating Diagnostics and Precision Drug Delivery.Current drug discovery technologies · 2026Review
- Thermally assisted microbot transport through high-viscosity media.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A 2D computational model of chemically- and mechanically-induced platelet plug formation.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Hemodynamic Performance, Three-Dimensional Flow Fields, and Turbulence Levels for Three Different Heart Valves at Three Different Hemodynamic Conditions.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- A new look at TFPI inhibition of factor X activation.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Vascularized platforms for investigating cell communication via extracellular vesicles.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Review
- In Silico Approach to Model Heat Distribution of Magnetic Hyperthermia in the Tumoral and Healthy Vascular Network Using Tumor-on-a-Chip to Evaluate Effective Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Reduced rotational flows enable the translation of surface-rolling microrobots in confined spaces.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Arterial dissections: Common features and new perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Microbots have been considered powerful tools in minimally invasive medicine. In the last few years, the topic has been highly studied by researchers across the globe to further develop the capabilities of microbots in medicine. One of many applications of these devices is performing surgical procedures inside the human circulatory system. It is expected that these microdevices traveling along the microvascular system can remove clots, deliver drugs, or even look for specific cells or regions to diagnose and treat. Although many studies have been published about this subject, the experimental influence of microbot morphology in hemodynamics of specific sites of the human circulatory system is yet to be explored. There are numerical studies already considering some of human physiological conditions, however, experimental validation is vital and demands further investigations. The roles of specific hemodynamic variables, the non-Newtonian behavior of blood and its particulate nature at small scales, the flow disturbances caused by the heart cycle, and the anatomy of certain arteries (i.e., bifurcations and tortuosity of vessels of some regions) in the determination of the dynamic performance of microbots are of paramount importance. This paper presents a critical analysis of the state-of-the-art literature related to pulsatile blood flow around microbots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.