Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34885330›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Study of an Ecological Cement-Based Composite with a Sustainable Raw Material, Sunflower Stalk Ash.

Adrian Alexandru Șerbănoiu, Cătălina Mihaela Grădinaru, Nicanor Cimpoeșu, Dumitru Filipeanu, Bogdan Vasile Șerbănoiu, Nelu Cristian Cherecheș

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrian Alexandru ȘerbănoiuFaculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4102-6579
Cătălina Mihaela GrădinaruFaculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3257-0580
Nicanor CimpoeșuFaculty of Material Science and Engineering, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania.
Dumitru FilipeanuFaculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania.
Bogdan Vasile ȘerbănoiuFaculty of Architecture "G.M. Cantacuzino", "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9858-0741
Nelu Cristian CherecheșFaculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iași, 700050 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7944-7275
Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iași · RO

Funding

"Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University from Iasi, Romania GI/P26/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of plant ash as a sustainable cementitious material in concrete composition is a widely researched subject in the construction domain. A plant studied so far more for its thermal insulation properties, sunflower, was analyzed in this study with regard to its ash effects on the concrete composition. The present research aimed to analyze the effects of a 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, or 30% volume replacement of cement by sunflower stalk ash (SA), a sustainable cementitious material, on the concrete compressive strength at 28 days and three months, the flexural and splitting tensile strengths, the resistance to repeated freeze-thaw cycles, and the resistance to chemical attack of hydrochloric acid. The elementary chemical composition of the SA and the composites was included also. According to the experimental results, SA decreased the values of the compressive and tensile strength of the concrete, but it improved the concrete behavior under repeated freeze-thaw cycles and under the action of hydrochloric acid. A percent of 10% of SA led to a much more pronounced development of compressive strength over time than conventional concrete (26.6% versus 12%).

Indexed as

agro-wasteeco-friendly materialecological concretesustainable building materials

Identifiers

PMID34885330
PMCPMC8658183
OpenAlexW3217435745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.