Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34885196›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Overview and Future Perspectives on Tumor-Targeted Positron Emission Tomography and Fluorescence Imaging of Pancreatic Cancer in the Era of Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Martijn A van Dam, Floris A Vuijk, Judith A Stibbe, Ruben D Houvast, Saskia A C Luelmo, Stijn Crobach, Shirin Shahbazi Feshtali, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei, Bert A Bonsing, Cornelis F M Sier and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibody-Based Approaches to Target Pancreatic Tumours.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martijn A van DamDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7736-2104
Floris A VuijkDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7888-924X
Judith A StibbeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ruben D HouvastDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8813-0330
Saskia A C LuelmoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Stijn CrobachDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Shirin Shahbazi FeshtaliDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lioe-Fee de Geus-OeiDepartment of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Leiden, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1817-2743
Bert A BonsingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cornelis F M SierDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4337-2758
Peter J K KuppenDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0294-3251
Rutger-Jan SwijnenburgDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Albert D WindhorstDepartment of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacobus BurggraafDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7912-0918
Alexander L VahrmeijerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Sven D MieogDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

Dutch Research Council 016.196.059European Union Horizon 2020 (Marie Sklodowska Curie grant) 734684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite recent advances in the multimodal treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), overall survival remains poor with a 5-year cumulative survival of approximately 10%. Neoadjuvant (chemo- and/or radio-) therapy is increasingly incorporated in treatment strategies for patients with (borderline) resectable and locally advanced disease. Neoadjuvant therapy aims to improve radical resection rates by reducing tumor mass and (partial) encasement of important vascular structures, as well as eradicating occult micrometastases. Results from recent multicenter clinical trials evaluating this approach demonstrate prolonged survival and increased complete surgical resection rates (R0). Currently, tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy is monitored using computed tomography (CT) following the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Accurate assessment of neoadjuvant treatment response and tumor resectability is considered a major challenge, as current conventional imaging modalities provide limited accuracy and specificity for discrimination between necrosis, fibrosis, and remaining vital tumor tissue. As a consequence, resections with tumor-positive margins and subsequent early locoregional tumor recurrences are observed in a substantial number of patients following surgical resection with curative intent. Of these patients, up to 80% are diagnosed with recurrent disease after a median disease-free interval of merely 8 months. These numbers underline the urgent need to improve imaging modalities for more accurate assessment of therapy response and subsequent re-staging of disease, thereby aiming to optimize individual patient's treatment strategy. In cases of curative intent resection, additional intra-operative real-time guidance could aid surgeons during complex procedures and potentially reduce the rate of incomplete resections and early (locoregional) tumor recurrences. In recent years intraoperative imaging in cancer has made a shift towards tumor-specific molecular targeting. Several important molecular targets have been identified that show overexpression in PDAC, for example: CA19.9, CEA, EGFR, VEGFR/VEGF-A, uPA/uPAR, and various integrins. Tumor-targeted PET/CT combined with intraoperative fluorescence imaging, could provide valuable information for tumor detection and staging, therapy response evaluation with re-staging of disease and intraoperative guidance during surgical resection of PDAC.

methodsA literature search in the PubMed database and (inter)national trial registers was conducted, focusing on studies published over the last 15 years. Data and information of eligible articles regarding PET/CT as well as fluorescence imaging in PDAC were reviewed. Areas covered: This review covers the current strategies, obstacles, challenges, and developments in targeted tumor imaging, focusing on the feasibility and value of PET/CT and fluorescence imaging for integration in the work-up and treatment of PDAC. An overview is given of identified targets and their characteristics, as well as the available literature of conducted and ongoing clinical and preclinical trials evaluating PDAC-targeted nuclear and fluorescent tracers.

Indexed as

fluorescence guided surgerynear-infrared fluorescence imagingneoadjuvant therapypancreatic ductal adenocarcinomapositron emission tomographyresponse monitoringtargeted molecular imaging

Identifiers

PMID34885196
PMCPMC8656821
OpenAlexW4200567351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.