Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34885172›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

Neoantigen-Reactive T Cells: The Driving Force behind Successful Melanoma Immunotherapy.

Lindy Davis, Ashley Tarduno, Yong-Chen Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Isolation of mitochondrial mutation-specific T cell receptors.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Neoantigen immunotherapy: a novel treatment for bladder cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Role of Calcium Signaling in Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lindy DavisDepartment of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Ashley TardunoDepartment of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6009-6142
Yong-Chen LuDepartment of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0275-9825
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USWinthrop Rockefeller Foundation · US

Funding

Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasUL1TR003107 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2019 to 2023
$21.6M
Institutional Career DevelopmentKL2TR003108 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI ARTHUR, JOHN M., BORSHEIM, ELISABET · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003108NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003107Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute X
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma have experienced significant clinical responses after checkpoint blockade immunotherapy or adoptive cell therapy. Neoantigens are mutated proteins that arise from tumor-specific mutations. It is hypothesized that the neoantigen recognition by T cells is the critical step for T-cell-mediated anti-tumor responses and subsequent tumor regressions. In addition to describing neoantigens, we review the sentinel and ongoing clinical trials that are helping to shape the current treatments for patients with cutaneous melanoma. We also present the existing evidence that establishes the correlations between neoantigen-reactive T cells and clinical responses in melanoma immunotherapy.

Indexed as

immunotherapymelanomaneoantigenT cell

Identifiers

PMID34885172
PMCPMC8657037
OpenAlexW3215392064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.