Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34884787›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Bacterial Cellulose: Production, Characterization, and Application as Antimicrobial Agent.

Dibyajit Lahiri, Moupriya Nag, Bandita Dutta, Ankita Dey, Tanmay Sarkar, Siddhartha Pati, Hisham Atan Edinur, Zulhisyam Abdul Kari, Noor Haslina Mohd Noor, Rina Rani Ray

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 310 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Dibyajit LahiriDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata 700156, West Bengal, India.
Moupriya NagDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Engineering & Management, Kolkata 700156, West Bengal, India.
Bandita DuttaDepartment of Biotechnology, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Haringhata 700156, West Bengal, India.
Ankita DeyDepartment of Pathology, Belle Vue Clinic, Kolkata 700156, West Bengal, India.
Tanmay SarkarMalda Polytechnic, West Bengal State Council of Technical Education, Government of West Bengal, Malda 732102, West Bengal, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-1604
Siddhartha PatiSkills Innovation & Academic Network (SIAN) Institute, Balasore 756001, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8276-0008
Hisham Atan EdinurSchool of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3379-6063
Zulhisyam Abdul KariFaculty of Agro Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Jeli 17600, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3160-7839
Noor Haslina Mohd NoorHaematology Department, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Rina Rani RayDepartment of Biotechnology, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Haringhata 700156, West Bengal, India.
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, West Bengal · INUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MYUniversity of Engineering & Management · INGovernment of West Bengal · INUniversiti Malaysia Kelantan · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial cellulose (BC) is recognized as a multifaceted, versatile biomaterial with abundant applications. Groups of microorganisms such as bacteria are accountable for BC synthesis through static or agitated fermentation processes in the presence of competent media. In comparison to static cultivation, agitated cultivation provides the maximum yield of the BC. A pure cellulose BC can positively interact with hydrophilic or hydrophobic biopolymers while being used in the biomedical domain. From the last two decades, the reinforcement of biopolymer-based biocomposites and its applicability with BC have increased in the research field. The harmony of hydrophobic biopolymers can be reduced due to the high moisture content of BC in comparison to hydrophilic biopolymers. Mechanical properties are the important parameters not only in producing green composite but also in dealing with tissue engineering, medical implants, and biofilm. The wide requisition of BC in medical as well as industrial fields has warranted the scaling up of the production of BC with added economy. This review provides a detailed overview of the production and properties of BC and several parameters affecting the production of BC and its biocomposites, elucidating their antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy with an insight to highlight their therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsBiopolymersCelluloseEscherichia coliGluconacetobacter xylinusHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsNanocompositesStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiopolymersCelluloseantibiofilmantimicrobialbiocompositenanocompositenatural polymer

Identifiers

PMID34884787
PMCPMC8657668
OpenAlexW3216986684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.