Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34884688›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Unsupervised Representation Learning for Proteochemometric Modeling.

Paul T Kim, Robin Winter, Djork-Arné Clevert

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. HyperPCM: Robust Task-Conditioned Modeling of Drug-Target Interactions.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beyond sequence: Structure-based machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul T KimBayer Machine Learning Research, Müllerstraße 178, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8950-7179
Robin WinterBayer Machine Learning Research, Müllerstraße 178, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0576-593X
Djork-Arné ClevertBayer Machine Learning Research, Müllerstraße 178, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4191-2156

Funding

European Commission 956832European Commission 963845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In silico protein-ligand binding prediction is an ongoing area of research in computational chemistry and machine learning based drug discovery, as an accurate predictive model could greatly reduce the time and resources necessary for the detection and prioritization of possible drug candidates. Proteochemometric modeling (PCM) attempts to create an accurate model of the protein-ligand interaction space by combining explicit protein and ligand descriptors. This requires the creation of information-rich, uniform and computer interpretable representations of proteins and ligands. Previous studies in PCM modeling rely on pre-defined, handcrafted feature extraction methods, and many methods use protein descriptors that require alignment or are otherwise specific to a particular group of related proteins. However, recent advances in representation learning have shown that unsupervised machine learning can be used to generate embeddings that outperform complex, human-engineered representations. Several different embedding methods for proteins and molecules have been developed based on various language-modeling methods. Here, we demonstrate the utility of these unsupervised representations and compare three protein embeddings and two compound embeddings in a fair manner. We evaluate performance on various splits of a benchmark dataset, as well as on an internal dataset of protein-ligand binding activities and find that unsupervised-learned representations significantly outperform handcrafted representations.

Indexed as

Unsupervised Machine LearningCheminformaticsLigandsProteinsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipLigandsProteinscomputational biologyprotein–ligand binding predictionunsupervised representation learning

Identifiers

PMID34884688
PMCPMC8657702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.