ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
PEACE: Perception and Expectations toward Artificial Intelligence in Capsule Endoscopy.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on artificial intelligence in patient care: a systematic review of hindering and facilitating factors on different levels.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- AI-Assisted Double-Headed Capsule Endoscopy: Multicentre Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study Across Small Bowel Indications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Asia-Pacific consensus on the use of artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2025Article
- Unmet Needs of Artificial Intelligence in Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Surgery: Cognition, Usage Patterns and Implementation Barriers of DeepSeek Among Healthcare Professionals in China's Tertiary Hospitals.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Chinese Oncologists' Perspectives on Integrating AI into Clinical Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- From Data to Insights: How Is AI Revolutionizing Small-Bowel Endoscopy?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Attitudes and perceptions of Chinese oncologists towards artificial intelligence in healthcare: a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Capsule Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Panenteric Capsule Endoscopy and Application of Artificial Intelligence.Gut and liver · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in (gastrointestinal) healthcare: patients' and physicians' perspectives.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Edge artificial intelligence wireless video capsule endoscopy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Small Bowel Detection for Wireless Capsule Endoscopy Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Temporal Filtering.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- New Generation Express View: An Artificial Intelligence Software Effectively Reduces Capsule Endoscopy Reading Times.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Nomenclature and Definition of Atrophic Lesions in Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: A Delphi Consensus Statement of the International CApsule endoscopy REsearch (I-CARE) Group.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Key research questions for implementation of artificial intelligence in capsule endoscopy.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Article
- Primary Care Provider Preferences Regarding Artificial Intelligence in Point-of-Care Cancer Screening.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in digestive endoscopy, especially in capsule endoscopy (CE). However, some physicians still have some difficulties and fear the advent of this technology. We aimed to evaluate the perceptions and current sentiments toward the use of AI in CE. An online survey questionnaire was sent to an audience of gastroenterologists. In addition, several European national leaders of the International CApsule endoscopy REsearch (I CARE) Group were asked to disseminate an online survey among their national communities of CE readers (CER). The survey included 32 questions regarding general information, perceptions of AI, and its use in daily life, medicine, endoscopy, and CE. Among 380 European gastroenterologists who answered this survey, 333 (88%) were CERs. The mean average time length of experience in CE reading was 9.9 years (0.5-22). A majority of CERs agreed that AI would positively impact CE, shorten CE reading time, and help standardize reporting in CE and characterize lesions seen in CE. Nevertheless, in the foreseeable future, a majority of CERs disagreed with the complete replacement all CE reading by AI. Most CERs believed in the high potential of AI for becoming a valuable tool for automated diagnosis and for shortening the reading time. Currently, the perception is that AI will not replace CE reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.