ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021
Restoration of Fertility in Patients with Spontaneous Premature Ovarian Insufficiency: New Techniques under the Microscope.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Secretome on Cell Functions in Human Endometrium.Cells · 2026Article
- Putative "ovarian awakening" in diminished ovarian reserve: a multicenter analysis demonstrates indistinguishability from regression to the mean.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells and platelet rich plasma in the treatment of premature ovarian insufficiency: a scoping review.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), a condition affecting up to 1% of women by the age of 40 years, is characterized by an extremely low chance of spontaneous pregnancy. Currently, fertility restoration options are virtually nonexistent for this population. To become pregnant, the only solution is egg donation. Interestingly, animal studies have provided encouraging results in terms of fertility restoration, and consequently, research has begun into the most promising approaches for women suffering from POI. The PubMed database was searched for studies in which techniques aiming at restoring fertility in women with spontaneous POI were tested. Although robust studies are lacking, the literature suggests a positive effect of certain techniques on fertility restoration in women with POI. The most promising approaches seem to be intraovarian injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma or of mesenchymal stem cells. In addition to these, in vitro and mechanical activation of dormant follicles and etiology-driven therapies have also been studied with mixed results. No safety concerns were raised in these studies. The absence of robust studies does not allow us to draw meaningful conclusions on the efficacy or superiority of any single technique at this stage, and so research in this area should continue using robust study designs, i.e., multicenter randomized controlled trials including sufficient subjects to achieve statistical power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.