Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34884297›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Cocaine Addiction: A Systematic Review.

Alezandra Torres-Castaño, Amado Rivero-Santana, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez, Andrea Duarte-Díaz, Ana Toledo-Chávarri, Vanesa Ramos-García, Yolanda Álvarez-Pérez, Javier Cudeiro-Mazaira, Iván Padrón-González, Pedro Serrano-Pérez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alezandra Torres-CastañoCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 El Rosario, Spain.
Amado Rivero-SantanaCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 El Rosario, Spain.
Lilisbeth Perestelo-PérezEvaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service (SESCS), 38019 El Rosario, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-7313
Andrea Duarte-DíazCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 El Rosario, Spain.
Ana Toledo-ChávarriCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 El Rosario, Spain.
Vanesa Ramos-GarcíaCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 El Rosario, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9106-2420
Yolanda Álvarez-PérezCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 El Rosario, Spain.
Javier Cudeiro-MazairaGalician Brain Stimulation Center, 15009 A Coruña, Spain.
Iván Padrón-GonzálezInstitute of Neuroscience, University of La Laguna, Guajara Campus, 38200 San Cristobal de La Laguna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8093-5225
Pedro Serrano-PérezGroup of Psychiatry, Mental Health and Addictions at the Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Servicio Canario de la Salud · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña · ESUniversidad de La Laguna · ESVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term cocaine use is associated with cognitive deficits and neuro-psychiatric pathologies. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging therapeutic strategy relating to changes in brain activity. It stimulates the prefrontal cortex and is involved in inhibitory cognitive control, decision making and care. This systematic review aims to evaluate and synthesize the evidence on the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of rTMS for the treatment of cocaine addiction. A systematic review of the literature was carried out. The following electronic databases were consulted from inception to October 2020: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science. Randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials and case-series and full economic evaluations were included. Twelve studies were included. No identified study reported data on cost-effectiveness. Significant results of the efficacy of TMS have been observed in terms of the reduction of craving to consume and the number of doses consumed. No serious adverse effects have been observed. Despite the low quality of the studies, the first results were observed in terms of reduction of cocaine use and craving. In any case, this effect is considered moderate. Studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are required.

Indexed as

cocaine use disordercravingnon-invasive brain stimulationsystematic reviewtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34884297
PMCPMC8658408
OpenAlexW3215470806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.