Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34884249›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Influence of Spine Curvature on the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Lumbar Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Veronika E Binder, Ursula S Hofstoetter, Anna Rienmüller, Zoltán Száva, Matthias J Krenn, Karen Minassian, Simon M Danner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Veronika E BinderInstitute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria.
Ursula S HofstoetterCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-6483
Anna RienmüllerDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7716-3583
Zoltán SzávaCompetence Center Medizintechnik, Austrian Workers' Compensation Board, 1200 Vienna, Austria.
Matthias J KrennDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3398-3627
Karen MinassianCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4197-6141
Simon M DannerDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4642-7064
Medical University of Vienna · ATDrexel University · USTU Wien · ATUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USWorkers Compensation Board of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Propriopsinal neuron function in normal and post-SCI locomotionR01NS112304 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI Simon Michael Danner, David SK Magnuson · 2021 to 2026
$3.0M
Spinal circuits for sensorimotor integration and interlimb coordination during locomotionR01NS115900 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI DANNER, SIMON MICHAEL · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
Austrian Science Fund I 3837-B34Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3837NIH HHS R01 NS112304NIH HHS R01 NS115900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation is a non-invasive method for neuromodulation of sensorimotor function. Its main mechanism of action results from the activation of afferent fibers in the posterior roots-the same structures as targeted by epidural stimulation. Here, we investigated the influence of sagittal spine alignment on the capacity of the surface-electrode-based stimulation to activate these neural structures. We evaluated electromyographic responses evoked in the lower limbs of ten healthy individuals during extension, flexion, and neutral alignment of the thoracolumbar spine. To control for position-specific effects, stimulation in these spine alignment conditions was performed in four different body positions. In comparison to neutral and extended spine alignment, flexion of the spine resulted in a strong reduction of the response amplitudes. There was no such effect on tibial-nerve evoked H reflexes. Further, there was a reduction of post-activation depression of the responses to transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation evoked in spinal flexion. Thus, afferent fibers were reliably activated with neutral and extended spine alignment. Spinal flexion, however, reduced the capacity of the stimulation to activate afferent fibers and led to the co-activation of motor fibers in the anterior roots. This change of action was due to biophysical rather than neurophysiological influences. We recommend applying transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in body positions that allow individuals to maintain a neutral or extended spine.

Indexed as

biophysicsH reflexhumanM waveneuromodulationposterior root-muscle reflexposterior root stimulationspinal cordspinal cord stimulationspinespine alignmenttranscutaneous

Identifiers

PMID34884249
PMCPMC8658162
OpenAlexW3217092207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.