Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34884242›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Comparison of Postoperative Hyphemas between Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Using a New Hyphema Scoring System.

Akiko Ishida, Sho Ichioka, Yuji Takayanagi, Aika Tsutsui, Kaoru Manabe, Masaki Tanito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Visual Function After Schlemm's Canal-Based MIGS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Risk factors for hyphema following goniotomy or trabecular bypass stent placement combined with phacoemulsification.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akiko IshidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Sho IchiokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Yuji TakayanagiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Aika TsutsuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Kaoru ManabeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.
Masaki TanitoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo 693-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6512-7203
Shimane University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have been using our in-house scoring system of hyphemas, i.e., Shimane University RLC postoperative hyphema scoring system (SU-RLC), which we designed to classify postoperative hyphema. SU-RLC classifies the severities of hyphemas based on three factors, i.e., red blood cells (RBCs) (R) 0-3, layer formation (L) 0-3, and clot (C) 0-1, by slit-lamp observation. To test the clinical usefulness of the SU-RLC for quantifying the postoperative hyphema severity, the SU-RLC scores were compared between eyes that underwent different minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) procedures, i.e., Tanito microhook ab interno trabeculotomy and cataract extraction (TMH-CE) (

Indexed as

hyphemaiStent trabecular micro-bypass systemminimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS)surgical complicationsurgical efficacyTanito microhook (TMH)

Identifiers

PMID34884242
PMCPMC8658073
OpenAlexW3216524839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.