Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34884236›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Malignant Pleural Effusions-A Review of Current Guidelines and Practices.

Prarthna Chandar Kulandaisamy, Sakthidev Kulandaisamy, Daniel Kramer, Christopher Mcgrath

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Management and prognosis of malignant pleural effusions managed with indwelling pleural catheters.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prarthna Chandar KulandaisamyDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Sakthidev KulandaisamyDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Daniel KramerDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Christopher McgrathDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) occurs in 15% of all cancer patients and usually portends poor prognosis while also serving to limit the patient's quality of life. Palliation of symptoms has been the goal for the management of these effusions while keeping the patient's hospital stay to a minimum. Traditionally, this has been achieved by chest tube drainage followed by the instillation of sclerosing agents, such as talc, in the pleural space. A recent increase in evidence for the effectiveness and convenience of indwelling pleural catheters has changed the management of MPE, which is reflected in the guidelines released by the American Thoracic Society as well their European Counterpart (ERS/BTS). In this article, we aim to review the current management practices and guidelines for MPE.

Indexed as

indwelling pleural catheterlung cancermalignant pleural effusionpleurodesisthoracentesis

Identifiers

PMID34884236
PMCPMC8658426
OpenAlexW3217123231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.