Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34884114›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Engineering Approaches for Programming Agent-Based IoT Objects Using the Resource Management Architecture.

Fabian Cesar Brandão, Maria Alice Trinta Lima, Carlos Eduardo Pantoja, Jean Zahn, José Viterbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabian Cesar BrandãoFederal Center for Technological Education (CEFET-RJ), Rio de Janeiro 20271-110, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0614-0592
Maria Alice Trinta LimaFederal Center for Technological Education (CEFET-RJ), Rio de Janeiro 20271-110, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4740-1800
Carlos Eduardo PantojaFederal Center for Technological Education (CEFET-RJ), Rio de Janeiro 20271-110, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7099-4974
Jean ZahnInstitute of Computing, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Niterói 24220-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6636-6836
José ViterboInstitute of Computing, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Niterói 24220-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0339-6624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) allows the sharing of information among devices in a network. Hardware evolutions have enabled the employment of cognitive agents on top of such devices, which could help to adopt pro-active and autonomous IoT systems. Agents are autonomous entities from Artificial Intelligence capable of sensing (perceiving) the environment where they are situated. Then, with these captured perceptions, they can reason and act pro-actively. However, some agent approaches are created for a specific domain or application when dealing with embedded systems and hardware interfacing. In addition, the agent architecture can compromise the system's performance because of the number of perceptions that agents can access. This paper presents three engineering approaches for creating IoT Objects using Embedded Multi-agent systems (MAS)-as cognitive systems at the edge of an IoT network-connecting, acting, and sharing information with a re-engineered IoT architecture based on the Sensor as a Service model. These engineering approaches use Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) agents and the JaCaMo framework. In addition, it is expected to diversify the designers' choice in applying embedded MAS in IoT systems. We also present a case study to validate the whole re-engineered architecture and the approaches. Moreover, some performance tests and comparisons are also presented. The study case shows that each approach is more or less suitable depending on the domain tackled. The performance tests show that the re-engineered IoT architecture is scalable and that there are some trade-offs in adopting one or another approach. The contributions of this paper are an architecture for sharing resources in an IoT network, the use of embedded MAS on top IoT Objects, and three engineering approaches considering agent and artifacts dimensions.

Indexed as

edge computingembedded multi-agent systemsIoT

Identifiers

PMID34884114
PMCPMC8659878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.