Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34884103›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Enhanced Bounding Box Estimation with Distribution Calibration for Visual Tracking.

Bin Yu, Ming Tang, Guibo Zhu, Jinqiao Wang, Hanqing Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bin YuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3097-1433
Ming TangNational Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 95 Zhongguancun East Road, Beijing 100190, China.
Guibo ZhuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Jinqiao WangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Hanqing LuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Funding

Key-Areas Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province 2020B010165001National Natural Science Foundation of China 61772527, 61976210, 62076235, 62002356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bounding box estimation by overlap maximization has improved the state of the art of visual tracking significantly, yet the improvement in robustness and accuracy is restricted by the limited reference information, i.e., the initial target. In this paper, we present DCOM, a novel bounding box estimation method for visual tracking, based on distribution calibration and overlap maximization. We assume every dimension in the modulation vector follows a Gaussian distribution, so that the mean and the variance can borrow from those of similar targets in large-scale training datasets. As such, sufficient and reliable reference information can be obtained from the calibrated distribution, leading to a more robust and accurate target estimation. Additionally, an updating strategy for the modulation vector is proposed to adapt the variation of the target object. Our method can be built on top of off-the-shelf networks without finetuning and extra parameters. It yields state-of-the-art performance on three popular benchmarks, including GOT-10k, LaSOT, and NfS while running at around 40 FPS, confirming its effectiveness and efficiency.

Indexed as

CalibrationNormal Distributionbounding box estimationdistribution calibrationoverlap maximizationvisual tracking

Identifiers

PMID34884103
PMCPMC8662439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.