Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34883800›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Detection of Unilateral Arm Paresis after Stroke by Wearable Accelerometers and Machine Learning.

Johan Wasselius, Eric Lyckegård Finn, Emma Persson, Petter Ericson, Christina Brogårdh, Arne G Lindgren, Teresa Ullberg, Kalle Åström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prehospital technologies for early stroke detection - A review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johan WasseliusDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, 22185 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1896-381X
Eric Lyckegård FinnUman Sense AB, 22381 Lund, Sweden.
Emma PerssonCentre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 22100 Lund, Sweden.
Petter EricsonUman Sense AB, 22381 Lund, Sweden.
Christina BrogårdhDepartment of Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine, Memory and Geriatrics, Skåne University Hospital, 22185 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9249-9421
Arne G LindgrenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 22185 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1942-7330
Teresa UllbergDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, 22185 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6717-0915
Kalle ÅströmCentre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 22100 Lund, Sweden.

Funding

Crafoord Foundation 20180610Fremasons Lodge of 410 Instruction Eos in Lund To AGLSkåne University Hospital #96437 and #96438Sparbanksstiftelsen Färs och Frosta To AGLSwedish Research Council 2019-01757the strategic research projects ELLIIT and eSSENCE, the Swedish 411 Foundation for Strategic Research project To KÅThe Swedish Government (under the Avtal om Läkarutbildning och 408 Medicinsk Forskning, ALF) #I-ALF 47447 and #YF-ALF 43435Wallenberg Artificial Intelligence, Autonomous 412 Systems and Software Program (WASP) To KÅ
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in stroke treatment have provided effective tools to successfully treat ischemic stroke, but still a majority of patients are not treated due to late arrival to hospital. With modern stroke treatment, earlier arrival would greatly improve the overall treatment results. This prospective study was performed to asses the capability of bilateral accelerometers worn in bracelets 24/7 to detect unilateral arm paralysis, a hallmark symptom of stroke, early enough to receive treatment. Classical machine learning algorithms as well as state-of-the-art deep neural networks were evaluated on detection times between 15 min and 120 min. Motion data were collected using triaxial accelerometer bracelets worn on both arms for 24 h. Eighty-four stroke patients with unilateral arm motor impairment and 101 healthy subjects participated in the study. Accelerometer data were divided into data windows of different lengths and analyzed using multiple machine learning algorithms. The results show that all algorithms performed well in separating the two groups early enough to be clinically relevant, based on wrist-worn accelerometers. The two evaluated deep learning models, fully convolutional network and InceptionTime, performed better than the classical machine learning models with an AUC score between 0.947-0.957 on 15 min data windows and up to 0.993-0.994 on 120 min data windows. Window lengths longer than 90 min only marginally improved performance. The difference in performance between the deep learning models and the classical models was statistically significant according to a non-parametric Friedman test followed by a post-hoc Nemenyi test. Introduction of wearable stroke detection devices may dramatically increase the portion of stroke patients eligible for revascularization and shorten the time to treatment. Since the treatment effect is highly time-dependent, early stroke detection may dramatically improve stroke outcomes.

Indexed as

StrokeWearable Electronic DevicesAccelerometryArmHumansMachine LearningParesisProspective Studiesaccelerometerartificial intelligencehemiparesismachine learningmonitoringmotor deficitsensorstrokewearable

Identifiers

PMID34883800
PMCPMC8659933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.