Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34883617›Full record

ReviewPolymers2021

Development of Polymer-Based Nanoformulations for Glioblastoma Brain Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis: An Update.

Bijuli Rabha, Kaushik Kumar Bharadwaj, Siddhartha Pati, Bhabesh Kumar Choudhury, Tanmay Sarkar, Zulhisyam Abdul Kari, Hisham Atan Edinur, Debabrat Baishya, Leonard Ionut Atanase

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Nanoparticle-Based Treatment in Glioblastoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Bijuli RabhaDepartment of Bioengineering & Technology, GUIST, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781014, India.
Kaushik Kumar BharadwajDepartment of Bioengineering & Technology, GUIST, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4027-487X
Siddhartha PatiSkills Innovation & Academic Network (SIAN) Institute-Association for Biodiversity Conservation and Research (ABC), Balasore 756001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8276-0008
Bhabesh Kumar ChoudhuryDepartment of Chemistry, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781014, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8640-8856
Tanmay SarkarMalda Polytechnic, West Bengal State Council of Technical Education, Govt. of West Bengal, Malda 732102, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-1604
Zulhisyam Abdul KariFaculty of Agro Based Industry, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Jeli 17600, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3160-7839
Hisham Atan EdinurSchool of Health Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3379-6063
Debabrat BaishyaDepartment of Bioengineering & Technology, GUIST, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2929-8539
Leonard Ionut AtanaseFaculty of Medical Dentistry, "Apollonia" University of Iasi, 700511 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3657-1492
Gauhati University · INApollonia University · ROJadavpur University · INUniversiti Malaysia Kelantan · MYUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

University Grants Commission F1-17.1/2015-16/NFST-2015-17-ST-ASS-3863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain cancers, mainly high-grade gliomas/glioblastoma, are characterized by uncontrolled proliferation and recurrence with an extremely poor prognosis. Despite various conventional treatment strategies, viz., resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, the outcomes are still inefficient against glioblastoma. The blood-brain barrier is one of the major issues that affect the effective delivery of drugs to the brain for glioblastoma therapy. Various studies have been undergone in order to find novel therapeutic strategies for effective glioblastoma treatment. The advent of nanodiagnostics, i.e., imaging combined with therapies termed as nanotheranostics, can improve the therapeutic efficacy by determining the extent of tumour distribution prior to surgery as well as the response to a treatment regimen after surgery. Polymer nanoparticles gain tremendous attention due to their versatile nature for modification that allows precise targeting, diagnosis, and drug delivery to the brain with minimal adverse side effects. This review addresses the advancements of polymer nanoparticles in drug delivery, diagnosis, and therapy against brain cancer. The mechanisms of drug delivery to the brain of these systems and their future directions are also briefly discussed.

Indexed as

blood–brain barrier (BBB)/blood brain tumour barrier (BBTB)drug delivery and imagingglioma/glioblastomananodiagnosticspolymer nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID34883617
PMCPMC8659151
OpenAlexW3215650221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.