Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34883366›Full record

ArticleHearing research2022

Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.

Soha N Garadat, Deborah J Colesa, Donald L Swiderski, Yehoash Raphael, Bryan E Pfingst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Marker for Local Spiral Ganglion Neuron Degeneration: The Failure Index.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Soha N GaradatDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA. Electronic address: garadat@umich.edu.
Deborah J ColesaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA.
Donald L SwiderskiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA.
Yehoash RaphaelDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA.
Bryan E PfingstDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5616, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Functionally Important Features of the Electrically Stimulated CochleaR01DC015809 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PFINGST, BRYAN E · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Across-Site Patterns of Perception with Cochlear ImplantsR01DC010786 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PFINGST, BRYAN E · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010786NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is generally believed that the efficacy of cochlear implants is partly dependent on the condition of the stimulated neural population. Cochlear pathology is likely to affect the manner in which neurons respond to electrical stimulation, potentially resulting in differences in perception of electrical stimuli across cochlear implant recipients and across the electrode array in individual cochlear implant users. Several psychophysical and electrophysiological measures have been shown to predict cochlear health in animals and were used to assess conditions near individual stimulation sites in humans. In this study, we examined the relationship between psychophysical strength-duration functions and spiral ganglion neuron density in two groups of guinea pigs with cochlear implants who had minimally-overlapping cochlear health profiles. One group was implanted in a hearing ear (N = 10) and the other group was deafened by cochlear perfusion of neomycin, inoculated with an adeno-associated viral vector with an Ntf3-gene insert (AAV.Ntf3) and implanted (N = 14). Psychophysically measured strength-duration functions for both monopolar and tripolar electrode configurations were then compared for the two treatment groups. Results were also compared to their histological outcomes. Overall, there were considerable differences between the two treatment groups in terms of their psychophysical performance as well as the relation between their functional performance and histological data. Animals in the neomycin-deafened, neurotrophin-treated, and implanted group (NNI) exhibited steeper strength-duration function slopes; slopes were positively correlated with SGN density (steeper slopes in animals that had higher SGN densities). In comparison, the implanted hearing (IH) group had shallower slopes and there was no relation between slopes and spiral ganglion density. Across all animals, slopes were negatively correlated with ensemble spontaneous activity levels (shallower slopes with higher ensemble spontaneous activity levels). We hypothesize that differences in strength-duration function slopes between the two treatment groups were related to the condition of the inner hair cells, which generate spontaneous activity that could affect the across-fiber synchrony and/or the size of the population of neural elements responding to electrical stimulation. In addition, it is likely that spiral ganglion neuron peripheral processes were present in the IH group, which could affect membrane properties of the stimulated neurons. Results suggest that the two treatment groups exhibited distinct patterns of variation in conditions near the stimulating electrodes that altered detection thresholds. Overall, the results of this study suggest a complex relationship between psychophysical detection thresholds for cochlear implant stimulation and nerve survival in the implanted cochlea. This relationship seems to depend on the characteristics of the electrical stimulus, the electrode configuration, and other biological features of the implanted cochlea such as the condition of the inner hair cells and the peripheral processes.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessAnimalsCochleaElectric StimulationGuinea PigsHearingSpiral GanglionCochlear healthCochlear implantElectrode configurationInner hair cellsSpiral ganglion neuronsStrength-duration functions

Identifiers

PMID34883366
PMCPMC8761176
OpenAlexW3215043935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.