Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34883310›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2022

The second pandemic: Examining structural inequality through reverberations of COVID-19 in Europe.

Amelia Fiske, Ilaria Galasso, Johanna Eichinger, Stuart McLennan, Isabella Radhuber, Bettina Zimmermann, Barbara Prainsack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amelia FiskeInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: a.fiske@tum.de.
Ilaria GalassoCollege of Business, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Johanna EichingerInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Stuart McLennanInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Isabella RadhuberDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bettina ZimmermannInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Barbara PrainsackDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

European Research CouncilWellcome Trust 203132/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While everyone has been impacted directly or indirectly by the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures to contain it, not everyone has been impacted in the same way and certainly not to the same degree. Media coverage in early 2020 emphasized the "unprecedented" nature of the pandemic, and some even predicted that the virus could be a global "equalizer." Ensuing debates over how the pandemic should be handled have often hinged on oppositions between protecting health and healthcare systems versus saving livelihoods and the economy, a dichotomy that we argue is false. Drawing on 482 interviews conducted in Germany, Italy, Ireland, Austria, German-speaking Switzerland and the UK over two points in a 6-month period as part of the 'Solidarity in times of Pandemics Research Consortium' (SolPan), we illustrate the ways that oppositions posed between saving lives or saving livelihoods fail to capture the entangled, long-standing nature of structural inequalities that have been revealed through the pandemic. Health- and wealth-related inequalities intersect to produce the "second pandemic," a term used by a research participant to explain the other forms of devastation that run in parallel with virus. Our findings thus complicate such dichotomies through a qualitative understanding of the pandemic as a lived experience. The pandemic emerges as a critical juncture which, in exacerbating these existing structural inequalities, also poses an opportunity to work to better resolve them.

Indexed as

COVID-19EuropeHumansItalyPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19EuropeHealthPandemicStructural inequalityWealth

Identifiers

PMID34883310
PMCPMC8648175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.